Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWZMX vs RGEBX
NWZMX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts NWZMX vs RGEBX
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr R6
Price$20.39
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets223.63M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$77.54
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
NWZMX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWZMX vs. RGEBX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWZMX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. NWZMX (224M). NWZMX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWZMX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: NWZMX (9 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than NWZMX (0.91). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NWZMX (8.16). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZMX: RGEBX (250) vs NWZMX (1000000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.34 vs. NWZMX (2.00). NWZMX return over 5 years is better than : 24.18 vs. RGEBX (19.19).
| NWZMX | RGEBX | NWZMX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.08 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.08 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.812 | 8.539 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 224M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.00 | 5.34 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.23 | 63.50 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.18 | 19.19 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 87.00 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement