Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWZMX vs RGACX
NWZMX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NWZMX vs RGACX
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr R6
Price$21.91
Change+$0.09 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets222.47M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.62
Change+$0.46 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
NWZMX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWZMX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWZMX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. NWZMX (222M). RGACX pays higher dividends than NWZMX: RGACX (0.07) vs NWZMX (0.00). NWZMX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NWZMX (8 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) and NWZMX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWZMX (8.16). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZMX: RGACX (250) vs NWZMX (1000000). NWZMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.55 vs. RGACX (17.83). RGACX (40.02) and NWZMX (38.45) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NWZMX | RGACX | NWZMX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.94 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.94 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.233 | 15.516 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 222M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.55 | 17.83 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.07 | 58.53 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.45 | 40.02 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement