Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWZMX vs RGACX
NWZMX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NWZMX vs RGACX
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr R6
Price$21.83
Change+$0.06 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets218.22M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
NWZMX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWZMX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWZMX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. NWZMX (218M). RGACX pays higher dividends than NWZMX: RGACX (0.07) vs NWZMX (0.00). NWZMX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NWZMX (8 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) and NWZMX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWZMX (8.16). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZMX: RGACX (250) vs NWZMX (1000000). NWZMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.84 vs. RGACX (14.08). NWZMX (42.96) and RGACX (41.95) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NWZMX | RGACX | NWZMX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.94 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.94 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.285 | 14.044 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.84 | 14.08 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.34 | 41.19 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.96 | 41.95 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 83.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement