Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWZLX vs VIGRX
NWZLX vs VIGRX Comparison
Open Charts NWZLX vs VIGRX
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr A
Price$20.37
Change+$0.19 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets213.15M
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$227.62
Change+$2.45 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.94B
NWZLX vs VIGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWZLX vs. VIGRX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWZLX is a Buy and VIGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 294B vs. NWZLX (213M). VIGRX pays higher dividends than NWZLX: VIGRX (0.34) vs NWZLX (0.00). NWZLX was incepted earlier than VIGRX: NWZLX (8 years) vs VIGRX (33 years). NWZLX (1.36) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). VIGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 11.00 vs. NWZLX (8.16). NWZLX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIGRX: NWZLX (2000) vs VIGRX (3000). VIGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.43 vs. NWZLX (11.74). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 115.36 vs. NWZLX (42.35).
| NWZLX | VIGRX | NWZLX / VIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.17 | 747% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.17 | 800% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.811 | 7.729 | 127% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 213M | 294B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.34 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.74 | 15.43 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.10 | 96.40 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.35 | 115.36 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 312.81 | - |