Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWZLX vs RGACX
NWZLX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NWZLX vs RGACX
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr A
Price$21.64
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets228.19M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.70
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
NWZLX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWZLX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWZLX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. NWZLX (228M). RGACX pays higher dividends than NWZLX: RGACX (0.07) vs NWZLX (0.00). NWZLX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NWZLX (8 years) vs RGACX (23 years). NWZLX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWZLX (8.16). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZLX: RGACX (250) vs NWZLX (2000). NWZLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.32 vs. RGACX (11.01). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.85 vs. NWZLX (34.74).
| NWZLX | RGACX | NWZLX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.94 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.94 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.658 | 17.655 | 94% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 228M | 337B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.32 | 11.01 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 81.39 | 70.57 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.74 | 37.85 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.78 | - |