Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWZLX vs RGACX
NWZLX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NWZLX vs RGACX
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr A
Price$20.86
Change-$0.48 (-2.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets218.4M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.05
Change-$1.88 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
NWZLX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWZLX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWZLX is a Hold and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. NWZLX (218M). RGACX pays higher dividends than NWZLX: RGACX (0.07) vs NWZLX (0.00). NWZLX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NWZLX (8 years) vs RGACX (24 years). NWZLX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWZLX (8.16). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZLX: RGACX (250) vs NWZLX (2000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.31 vs. NWZLX (4.40). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.90 vs. NWZLX (32.55).
| NWZLX | RGACX | NWZLX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.94 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.94 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.040 | 19.364 | 78% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.40 | 8.31 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.15 | 63.31 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.55 | 37.90 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement