NWWCF
Price
$5.63
Change
-$0.27 (-4.58%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
23.36B
PIAIF
Price
$6.50
Change
-$0.65 (-9.09%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
132.7B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NWWCF vs PIAIF

Header iconNWWCF vs PIAIF Comparison
Open Charts NWWCF vs PIAIFBanner chart's image
New China Life Ins
Price$5.63
Change-$0.27 (-4.58%)
Volume$2.02K
Capitalization23.36B
Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China
Price$6.50
Change-$0.65 (-9.09%)
Volume$836
Capitalization132.7B
NWWCF vs PIAIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NWWCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIAIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NWWCF vs. PIAIF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWWCF is a Hold and PIAIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (NWWCF: $5.63 vs. PIAIF: $6.50)
Brand notoriety: NWWCF and PIAIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NWWCF: 129% vs. PIAIF: 17%
Market capitalization -- NWWCF: $23.36B vs. PIAIF: $132.7B
NWWCF [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $23.36B. PIAIF’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $132.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $132.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NWWCF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePIAIF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NWWCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PIAIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NWWCF is a better buy in the long-term than PIAIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NWWCF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PIAIF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NWWCF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PIAIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NWWCF is a better buy in the short-term than PIAIF.

Price Growth

NWWCF (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PIAIF (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -3.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.55%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-0.62% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PIAIF($133B) has a higher market cap than NWWCF($23.4B). PIAIF has higher P/E ratio than NWWCF: PIAIF (7.05) vs NWWCF (4.18). NWWCF YTD gains are higher at: 181.078 vs. PIAIF (19.266). PIAIF has more cash in the bank: 974B vs. NWWCF (32.6B). NWWCF has less debt than PIAIF: NWWCF (20.9B) vs PIAIF (1.34T). PIAIF has higher revenues than NWWCF: PIAIF (738B) vs NWWCF (142B).
NWWCFPIAIFNWWCF / PIAIF
Capitalization23.4B133B18%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD181.07819.266940%
P/E Ratio4.187.0559%
Revenue142B738B19%
Total Cash32.6B974B3%
Total Debt20.9B1.34T2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PIAIF: Fundamental Ratings
PIAIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
52
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
1
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
20

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NWWCFPIAIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NWWCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIAIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VTLE18.340.49
+2.75%
Vital Energy
BHF55.740.80
+1.46%
Brighthouse Financial
FCNCA1850.38-13.92
-0.75%
First Citizens BancShares
TROO1.22-0.05
-3.94%
TROOPS
ARTW2.50-0.15
-5.66%
Art's-Way Manufacturing Co

NWWCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NWWCF and AFL have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NWWCF and AFL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWWCF
1D Price
Change %
NWWCF100%
N/A
AFL - NWWCF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
PIAIF - NWWCF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GWLIF - NWWCF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.95%
ELFIF - NWWCF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
DCYHY - NWWCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PIAIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PIAIF and AAIGF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PIAIF and AAIGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIAIF
1D Price
Change %
PIAIF100%
N/A
AAIGF - PIAIF
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.28%
NWWCF - PIAIF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GWLIF - PIAIF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.95%
MDBPF - PIAIF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DLICY - PIAIF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
More