NWWCF
Price
$6.57
Change
+$0.58 (+9.68%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
26.35B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PIAIF
Price
$7.34
Change
-$0.41 (-5.29%)
Updated
Dec 9 closing price
Capitalization
157.45B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NWWCF vs PIAIF

Header iconNWWCF vs PIAIF Comparison
Open Charts NWWCF vs PIAIFBanner chart's image
New China Life Ins
Price$6.57
Change+$0.58 (+9.68%)
Volume$785
Capitalization26.35B
Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China
Price$7.34
Change-$0.41 (-5.29%)
Volume$91K
Capitalization157.45B
NWWCF vs PIAIF Comparison Chart in %
NWWCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PIAIF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NWWCF vs. PIAIF commentary
Dec 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWWCF is a Hold and PIAIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 14, 2025
Stock price -- (NWWCF: $5.99 vs. PIAIF: $7.34)
Brand notoriety: NWWCF and PIAIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NWWCF: 8% vs. PIAIF: 815%
Market capitalization -- NWWCF: $26.35B vs. PIAIF: $157.45B
NWWCF [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $26.35B. PIAIF’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $157.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $160.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $27.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NWWCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePIAIF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NWWCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PIAIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PIAIF is a better buy in the long-term than NWWCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NWWCF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PIAIF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NWWCF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PIAIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PIAIF is a better buy in the short-term than NWWCF.

Price Growth

NWWCF (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -6.83% price change this week, while PIAIF (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +1.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+1.53% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PIAIF($157B) has a higher market cap than NWWCF($26.4B). PIAIF has higher P/E ratio than NWWCF: PIAIF (6.78) vs NWWCF (3.77). NWWCF YTD gains are higher at: 199.101 vs. PIAIF (34.679). PIAIF has more cash in the bank: 936B vs. NWWCF (28.8B). NWWCF has less debt than PIAIF: NWWCF (21B) vs PIAIF (1.39T). PIAIF has higher revenues than NWWCF: PIAIF (966B) vs NWWCF (157B).
NWWCFPIAIFNWWCF / PIAIF
Capitalization26.4B157B17%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD199.10134.679574%
P/E Ratio3.776.7856%
Revenue157B966B16%
Total Cash28.8B936B3%
Total Debt21B1.39T2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PIAIF: Fundamental Ratings
PIAIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
80
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
1
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NWWCFPIAIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NWWCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PIAIF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBUS1.740.08
+4.82%
Cibus
DRVN15.510.30
+1.94%
Driven Brands Holdings
ITT174.893.02
+1.76%
ITT
MTNB0.79N/A
+0.37%
Matinas Biopharma Holdings Inc
TBN25.760.08
+0.31%
Tamboran Resources Corp.

NWWCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NWWCF and PIAIF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NWWCF and PIAIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWWCF
1D Price
Change %
NWWCF100%
-10.18%
PIAIF - NWWCF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FLFG - NWWCF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GWLIF - NWWCF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
ELFIF - NWWCF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
DCYHY - NWWCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PIAIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIAIF has been loosely correlated with PNGAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PIAIF jumps, then PNGAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIAIF
1D Price
Change %
PIAIF100%
N/A
PNGAY - PIAIF
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
AAIGF - PIAIF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
AAGIY - PIAIF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
CILJF - PIAIF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
PUKPF - PIAIF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More