NWLXF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 11 closing price
TSPCF
Price
$2.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 8 closing price
Ad is loading...

NWLXF vs TSPCF

Header iconNWLXF vs TSPCF Comparison
Open Charts NWLXF vs TSPCFBanner chart's image
NEWLOX GOLD VENTURES
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$9.2K
CapitalizationN/A
Cleanaway Waste Management
Price$2.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$703
CapitalizationN/A
NWLXF vs TSPCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NWLXF vs. TSPCF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWLXF is a Hold and TSPCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (NWLXF: $0.06 vs. TSPCF: $2.10)
Brand notoriety: NWLXF and TSPCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NWLXF: 27% vs. TSPCF: 23%
Market capitalization -- NWLXF: $16.63M vs. TSPCF: $4.09B
NWLXF [@Environmental Services] is valued at $16.63M. TSPCF’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $4.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NWLXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTSPCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NWLXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TSPCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NWLXF and TSPCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

NWLXF (@Environmental Services) experienced а +49.25% price change this week, while TSPCF (@Environmental Services) price change was +19.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -4.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (-4.57% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSPCF($4.09B) has a higher market cap than NWLXF($16.6M). TSPCF YTD gains are higher at: 17.978 vs. NWLXF (-42.803). TSPCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 527M vs. NWLXF (-701.53K). TSPCF has more cash in the bank: 69.4M vs. NWLXF (1.48M). NWLXF has less debt than TSPCF: NWLXF (2.23M) vs TSPCF (1.07B). TSPCF has higher revenues than NWLXF: TSPCF (3.38B) vs NWLXF (3.11M).
NWLXFTSPCFNWLXF / TSPCF
Capitalization16.6M4.09B0%
EBITDA-701.53K527M-0%
Gain YTD-42.80317.978-238%
P/E RatioN/A75.76-
Revenue3.11M3.38B0%
Total Cash1.48M69.4M2%
Total Debt2.23M1.07B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TSPCF: Fundamental Ratings
TSPCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
91
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
58
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X90584.1640002628.351600
+2.99%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA330.241.75
+0.53%
Tesla
AAPL225.120.89
+0.40%
Apple
SPY597.190.29
+0.05%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.46-0.38
-1.42%
GameStop Corp

NWLXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NWLXF and AQMS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NWLXF and AQMS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWLXF
1D Price
Change %
NWLXF100%
N/A
AQMS - NWLXF
28%
Poorly correlated
-5.80%
VEOEF - NWLXF
11%
Poorly correlated
-4.03%
VCIGF - NWLXF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LICY - NWLXF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.27%
CTRNF - NWLXF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TSPCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TSPCF and LNZA have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TSPCF and LNZA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSPCF
1D Price
Change %
TSPCF100%
N/A
LNZA - TSPCF
11%
Poorly correlated
-7.09%
ROOOF - TSPCF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMBI - TSPCF
4%
Poorly correlated
-4.76%
NWLXF - TSPCF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGXXF - TSPCF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More