Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWHVX vs PMBPX
NWHVX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts NWHVX vs PMBPX
Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Gr A
Price$11.56
Change-$0.17 (-1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.41M
NWHVX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHVX vs. PMBPX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHVX is a Buy and PMBPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 32B vs. NWHVX (263M). PMBPX pays higher dividends than NWHVX: PMBPX (0.01) vs NWHVX (0.00). NWHVX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: NWHVX (27 years) vs PMBPX (25 years). NWHVX (1.10) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). NWHVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.32 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWHVX: PMBPX (0) vs NWHVX (2000). PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.82 vs. NWHVX (-15.85). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 31.53 vs. NWHVX (-49.33).
| NWHVX | PMBPX | NWHVX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.83 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.83 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.929 | 2.922 | -32% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 263M | 32B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.85 | -4.82 | 329% |
| Returns for 3 years | -26.69 | 34.82 | -77% |
| Returns for 5 years | -49.33 | 31.53 | -156% |
| Returns for 10 years | -57.21 | 106.99 | -53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers