Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWHVX vs PCBIX
NWHVX vs PCBIX Comparison
Open Charts NWHVX vs PCBIX
Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Gr A
Price$11.56
Change-$0.17 (-1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.41M
Principal MidCap Institutional
Price$45.20
Change-$0.72 (-1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.99B
NWHVX vs PCBIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHVX vs. PCBIX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHVX is a Buy and PCBIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCBIX has more cash in the bank: 32B vs. NWHVX (263M). PCBIX pays higher dividends than NWHVX: PCBIX (0.12) vs NWHVX (0.00). NWHVX was incepted earlier than PCBIX: NWHVX (27 years) vs PCBIX (25 years). NWHVX (1.10) is less costly to investors than PCBIX (0.67). NWHVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.32 vs. PCBIX (10.50). PCBIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWHVX: PCBIX (0) vs NWHVX (2000). PCBIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.65 vs. NWHVX (-15.85). PCBIX return over 5 years is better than : 33.05 vs. NWHVX (-49.33).
| NWHVX | PCBIX | NWHVX / PCBIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.67 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.67 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.929 | 3.029 | -31% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 263M | 32B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.85 | -4.65 | 341% |
| Returns for 3 years | -26.69 | 35.68 | -75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -49.33 | 33.05 | -149% |
| Returns for 10 years | -57.21 | 111.81 | -51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers