Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWHMX vs VFWPX
NWHMX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts NWHMX vs VFWPX
Nationwide Bailard Intl Eqs R6
Price$11.50
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.4M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$154.03
Change+$0.41 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.1B
NWHMX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHMX vs. VFWPX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHMX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 76.1B vs. NWHMX (266M). NWHMX pays higher dividends than VFWPX: NWHMX (2.95) vs VFWPX (2.69). NWHMX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: NWHMX (12 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). NWHMX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). NWHMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.37 vs. VFWPX (5.00). NWHMX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: NWHMX (1000000) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.18 vs. NWHMX (25.62). NWHMX return over 5 years is better than : 55.23 vs. VFWPX (32.98).
| NWHMX | VFWPX | NWHMX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 2,933% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 2,933% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.441 | 29.164 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 266M | 76.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.95 | 2.69 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.62 | 28.18 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.28 | 49.71 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.23 | 32.98 | 167% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.65 | 78.85 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers