Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWHJX vs VFWPX
NWHJX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts NWHJX vs VFWPX
Nationwide Bailard Intl Eqs A
Price$12.22
Change+$0.54 (+4.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets281.73M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$163.39
Change+$13.31 (+8.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.2B
NWHJX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHJX vs. VFWPX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHJX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 78.2B vs. NWHJX (282M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than NWHJX: VFWPX (2.93) vs NWHJX (2.24). NWHJX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: NWHJX (20 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). NWHJX (1.05) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). NWHJX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.36 vs. VFWPX (6.00). NWHJX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: NWHJX (2000) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.29 vs. NWHJX (31.05). NWHJX return over 5 years is better than : 59.92 vs. VFWPX (34.77).
| NWHJX | VFWPX | NWHJX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.03 | 3,333% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.03 | 3,500% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.099 | 6.471 | 110% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 282M | 78.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.24 | 2.93 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.05 | 34.29 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.18 | 47.98 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.92 | 34.77 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.15 | 110.45 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers