Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWHGX vs SSGSX
NWHGX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NWHGX vs SSGSX
Nationwide Bailard Cogntv Val R6
Price$16.21
Change-$0.23 (-1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.9M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.80
Change-$0.57 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.23B
NWHGX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHGX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHGX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.23B vs. NWHGX (111M). NWHGX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NWHGX (1.11) vs SSGSX (0.49). NWHGX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NWHGX (12 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NWHGX (0.93). NWHGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 278.84 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWHGX: SSGSX (2500) vs NWHGX (1000000). NWHGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.26 vs. SSGSX (-12.62). NWHGX return over 5 years is better than : 53.77 vs. SSGSX (8.71).
| NWHGX | SSGSX | NWHGX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.451 | -0.129 | -5,766% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111M | 5.23B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.49 | 229% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.26 | -12.62 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.07 | -6.25 | -241% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.77 | 8.71 | 617% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.73 | 20.45 | 243% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement