Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWHGX vs SSGSX
NWHGX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NWHGX vs SSGSX
Nationwide Bailard Cogntv Val R6
Price$15.97
Change-$0.03 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.01M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.95
Change+$0.15 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.31B
NWHGX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHGX vs. SSGSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHGX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.31B vs. NWHGX (108M). NWHGX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NWHGX (1.10) vs SSGSX (0.48). NWHGX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NWHGX (12 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NWHGX (0.93). NWHGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 278.84 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWHGX: SSGSX (2500) vs NWHGX (1000000). NWHGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.89 vs. SSGSX (-8.48). NWHGX return over 5 years is better than : 61.17 vs. SSGSX (18.06).
| NWHGX | SSGSX | NWHGX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.379 | -1.034 | -424% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 108M | 5.31B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.48 | 231% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.89 | -8.48 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.99 | 1.10 | 1,821% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.17 | 18.06 | 339% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.84 | 18.76 | 239% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers