Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWHFX vs SSGSX
NWHFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NWHFX vs SSGSX
Nationwide Bailard Cogntv Val M
Price$16.23
Change-$0.23 (-1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.29M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.80
Change-$0.57 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.23B
NWHFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHFX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHFX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.23B vs. NWHFX (109M). NWHFX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NWHFX (1.11) vs SSGSX (0.49). NWHFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NWHFX (24 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NWHFX (0.93). NWHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 278.84 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWHFX: SSGSX (2500) vs NWHFX (5000). NWHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.25 vs. SSGSX (-12.62). NWHFX return over 5 years is better than : 51.25 vs. SSGSX (8.71).
| NWHFX | SSGSX | NWHFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.441 | -0.129 | -5,758% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109M | 5.23B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.49 | 229% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.25 | -12.62 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.28 | -6.25 | -228% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.25 | 8.71 | 588% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.41 | 20.45 | 227% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement