Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWHFX vs SSGSX
NWHFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NWHFX vs SSGSX
Nationwide Bailard Cogntv Val M
Price$16.35
Change+$0.20 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets115.82M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$48.32
Change+$1.94 (+4.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.04B
NWHFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHFX vs. SSGSX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHFX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.04B vs. NWHFX (116M). NWHFX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NWHFX (1.28) vs SSGSX (0.58). NWHFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NWHFX (25 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than NWHFX (0.78). NWHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 404.58 vs. SSGSX (50.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWHFX: SSGSX (2500) vs NWHFX (5000). NWHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.07 vs. SSGSX (3.83). NWHFX return over 5 years is better than : 23.16 vs. SSGSX (-0.23).
| NWHFX | SSGSX | NWHFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.23 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.23 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.063 | 8.123 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 116M | 5.04B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 0.58 | 222% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.07 | 3.83 | 211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.83 | -3.10 | -414% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.16 | -0.23 | -10,230% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.96 | 53.01 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement