Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWHFX vs SSGSX
NWHFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NWHFX vs SSGSX
Nationwide Bailard Cogntv Val M
Price$15.43
Change+$0.05 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.79M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.63
Change+$0.07 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.12B
NWHFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHFX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHFX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.13B vs. NWHFX (110M). NWHFX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NWHFX (1.07) vs SSGSX (0.48). NWHFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NWHFX (25 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than NWHFX (0.93). NWHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 278.84 vs. SSGSX (50.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWHFX: SSGSX (2500) vs NWHFX (5000). NWHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.19 vs. SSGSX (-2.42). NWHFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.42 vs. SSGSX (-0.63).
| NWHFX | SSGSX | NWHFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.23 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.23 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.718 | -1.723 | -42% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110M | 5.13B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.48 | 226% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.19 | -2.42 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.06 | 0.45 | 3,315% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.42 | -0.63 | -4,163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.17 | 18.71 | 215% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers