Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWHFX vs SSGSX
NWHFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NWHFX vs SSGSX
Nationwide Bailard Cogntv Val M
Price$16.88
Change+$0.25 (+1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets113.8M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.21
Change+$0.63 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.18B
NWHFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHFX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHFX is a Buy and SSGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.18B vs. NWHFX (114M). NWHFX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NWHFX (1.07) vs SSGSX (0.48). NWHFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NWHFX (25 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NWHFX (0.93). NWHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 278.84 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWHFX: SSGSX (2500) vs NWHFX (5000). NWHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.99 vs. SSGSX (-13.68). NWHFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.35 vs. SSGSX (4.92).
| NWHFX | SSGSX | NWHFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.008 | 0.582 | 1,549% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 114M | 5.18B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.48 | 226% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.99 | -13.68 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.41 | -7.65 | -188% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.35 | 4.92 | 881% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.15 | 17.51 | 258% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement