Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWHDX vs SSGSX
NWHDX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NWHDX vs SSGSX
Nationwide Bailard Cogntv Val A
Price$15.82
Change-$0.04 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.01M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.95
Change+$0.15 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.31B
NWHDX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWHDX vs. SSGSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWHDX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.31B vs. NWHDX (108M). NWHDX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NWHDX (1.04) vs SSGSX (0.48). NWHDX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NWHDX (20 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). NWHDX (1.43) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). NWHDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 278.84 vs. SSGSX (37.00). NWHDX (6%) and SSGSX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. NWHDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: NWHDX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). NWHDX (-8.24) and SSGSX (-8.48) have marching annual gain over last year. NWHDX return over 5 years is better than : 58.47 vs. SSGSX (18.06).
| NWHDX | SSGSX | NWHDX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.26 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.26 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.147 | -1.034 | -401% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 108M | 5.31B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.48 | 217% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.24 | -8.48 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.69 | 1.10 | 1,703% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.47 | 18.06 | 324% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.80 | 18.76 | 212% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement