NWGL
Price
$1.25
Change
-$0.05 (-3.85%)
Updated
Jan 22, 12:26 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
246.64M
STLJF
Price
$48.20
Change
+$2.23 (+4.85%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
3.32B
Ad is loading...

NWGL vs STLJF

Header iconNWGL vs STLJF Comparison
Open Charts NWGL vs STLJFBanner chart's image
Nature Wood Group
Price$1.25
Change-$0.05 (-3.85%)
Volume$596
Capitalization246.64M
Stella Jones
Price$48.20
Change+$2.23 (+4.85%)
Volume$15.14K
Capitalization3.32B
NWGL vs STLJF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NWGL vs. STLJF commentary
Jan 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWGL is a Hold and STLJF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 22, 2025
Stock price -- (NWGL: $1.30 vs. STLJF: $48.20)
Brand notoriety: NWGL and STLJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Forest Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NWGL: 253% vs. STLJF: 107%
Market capitalization -- NWGL: $246.64M vs. STLJF: $3.32B
NWGL [@Forest Products] is valued at $246.64M. STLJF’s [@Forest Products] market capitalization is $3.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Forest Products] industry ranges from $9.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Forest Products] industry is $2.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NWGL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTLJF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NWGL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STLJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, STLJF is a better buy in the long-term than NWGL.

Price Growth

NWGL (@Forest Products) experienced а +14.04% price change this week, while STLJF (@Forest Products) price change was +4.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Forest Products industry was +0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.47%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Forest Products (+0.72% weekly)

Forest products are materials derived from forestry for direct consumption or commercial use. Wood, for example, has variety or uses ranging from generating wood fuel (e.g. in the form of firewood or charcoal) to providing structural materials for the construction of buildings and home improvement, or in the form of wood pulp that is used in the paper production. . Pulp and paper industry, in particular, creates high volume demand for the wood materials including both softwood and hardwood. Major companies making such products include Trex Company, Inc. (manufacturer of wood-alternative decking and railings), Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (makes engineered wood building products) and Universal Forest Products, Inc. (manufactures and distributes wood and wood-alternative products, pressure-treated wood, and is a solid-sawn lumber buyer; makes products for use in home improvement and construction industries).

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STLJF($3.32B) has a higher market cap than NWGL($247M). NWGL has higher P/E ratio than STLJF: NWGL (29.85) vs STLJF (14.02). NWGL YTD gains are higher at: 10.169 vs. STLJF (-2.515).
NWGLSTLJFNWGL / STLJF
Capitalization247M3.32B7%
EBITDAN/A608M-
Gain YTD10.169-2.515-404%
P/E Ratio29.8514.02213%
RevenueN/A3.32B-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A1.61B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
STLJF: Fundamental Ratings
STLJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
15
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
36
SMR RATING
1..100
50
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X106146.2660004129.601600
+4.05%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY603.055.47
+0.92%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME27.47-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp
TSLA424.07-2.43
-0.57%
Tesla
AAPL222.64-7.34
-3.19%
Apple

NWGL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NWGL and STLJF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NWGL and STLJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWGL
1D Price
Change %
NWGL100%
+0.39%
STLJF - NWGL
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WFSTF - NWGL
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.87%
WFG - NWGL
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.32%
TCOR - NWGL
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RUBNF - NWGL
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

STLJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STLJF and NWGL have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STLJF and NWGL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STLJF
1D Price
Change %
STLJF100%
N/A
NWGL - STLJF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
HMTC - STLJF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IFSPF - STLJF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
TCOR - STLJF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCABY - STLJF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More