NWG
Price
$14.14
Change
+$0.57 (+4.20%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
29.27B
89 days until earnings call
WF
Price
$54.73
Change
-$0.47 (-0.85%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
7.73B
88 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NWG vs WF

Header iconNWG vs WF Comparison
Open Charts NWG vs WFBanner chart's image
NatWest Group
Price$14.14
Change+$0.57 (+4.20%)
Volume$5.3M
Capitalization29.27B
Woori Financial Group
Price$54.73
Change-$0.47 (-0.85%)
Volume$77.9K
Capitalization7.73B
NWG vs WF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NWG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NWG vs. WF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWG is a StrongBuy and WF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (NWG: $14.14 vs. WF: $54.73)
Brand notoriety: NWG and WF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NWG: 120% vs. WF: 110%
Market capitalization -- NWG: $29.27B vs. WF: $7.73B
NWG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $29.27B. WF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $7.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NWG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • NWG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NWG and WF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NWG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NWG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NWG is a better buy in the short-term than WF.

Price Growth

NWG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.08% price change this week, while WF (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

NWG is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

WF is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NWG($29.3B) has a higher market cap than WF($7.73B). NWG has higher P/E ratio than WF: NWG (5.44) vs WF (3.62). WF YTD gains are higher at: 77.177 vs. NWG (43.839). WF has higher revenues than NWG: WF (11.84T) vs NWG (14.8B).
NWGWFNWG / WF
Capitalization29.3B7.73B379%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD43.83977.17757%
P/E Ratio5.443.62150%
Revenue14.8B11.84T0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt60.1BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NWG vs WF: Fundamental Ratings
NWG
WF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2377
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
312
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4337
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3119
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WF's Valuation (14) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as NWG (43). This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to NWG’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WF (12). This means that NWG’s stock grew similarly to WF’s over the last 12 months.

WF's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as NWG (4). This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to NWG’s over the last 12 months.

WF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as NWG (43). This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to NWG’s over the last 12 months.

WF's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as NWG (31). This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to NWG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NWGWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NWG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MNA35.430.06
+0.17%
NYLI Merger Arbitrage ETF
KMAR26.50N/A
N/A
Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -Mar
EKG17.76N/A
N/A
First Trust Nasdaq Lux Dgtl Hlth SoluETF
GSJY42.39-0.46
-1.06%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® Japan Eq ETF
USO74.85-1.24
-1.63%
United States Oil

NWG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWG has been closely correlated with LYG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NWG jumps, then LYG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWG
1D Price
Change %
NWG100%
+4.20%
LYG - NWG
72%
Closely correlated
+1.89%
DB - NWG
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
MFG - NWG
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
BANC - NWG
51%
Loosely correlated
+3.56%
COLB - NWG
48%
Loosely correlated
+6.30%
More

WF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WF has been closely correlated with SHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WF jumps, then SHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WF
1D Price
Change %
WF100%
-0.85%
SHG - WF
78%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
KB - WF
73%
Closely correlated
-4.92%
NWG - WF
42%
Loosely correlated
+4.20%
BANC - WF
37%
Loosely correlated
+3.56%
BSAC - WF
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
More