NWFL
Price
$29.97
Change
-$0.28 (-0.93%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
277.65M
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RBCAA
Price
$74.28
Change
+$0.37 (+0.50%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
1.45B
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NWFL vs RBCAA

Header iconNWFL vs RBCAA Comparison
Open Charts NWFL vs RBCAABanner chart's image
Norwood Financial
Price$29.97
Change-$0.28 (-0.93%)
Volume$40.33K
Capitalization277.65M
Republic Ban
Price$74.28
Change+$0.37 (+0.50%)
Volume$35.1K
Capitalization1.45B
NWFL vs RBCAA Comparison Chart in %
NWFL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RBCAA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NWFL vs. RBCAA commentary
Dec 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWFL is a StrongBuy and RBCAA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 13, 2025
Stock price -- (NWFL: $30.25 vs. RBCAA: $73.91)
Brand notoriety: NWFL and RBCAA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NWFL: 135% vs. RBCAA: 190%
Market capitalization -- NWFL: $277.65M vs. RBCAA: $1.45B
NWFL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $277.65M. RBCAA’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NWFL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRBCAA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NWFL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RBCAA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RBCAA is a better buy in the long-term than NWFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NWFL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBCAA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NWFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RBCAA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RBCAA is a better buy in the short-term than NWFL.

Price Growth

NWFL (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.14% price change this week, while RBCAA (@Regional Banks) price change was +7.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

NWFL is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2026.

RBCAA is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBCAA($1.45B) has a higher market cap than NWFL($278M). NWFL has higher P/E ratio than RBCAA: NWFL (46.11) vs RBCAA (11.39). NWFL YTD gains are higher at: 16.908 vs. RBCAA (7.857). NWFL has less debt than RBCAA: NWFL (72.1M) vs RBCAA (409M). RBCAA has higher revenues than NWFL: RBCAA (406M) vs NWFL (63.5M).
NWFLRBCAANWFL / RBCAA
Capitalization278M1.45B19%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.9087.857215%
P/E Ratio46.1111.39405%
Revenue63.5M406M16%
Total Cash32.1MN/A-
Total Debt72.1M409M18%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NWFL vs RBCAA: Fundamental Ratings
NWFL
RBCAA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2824
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5414
SMR RATING
1..100
7320
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4650
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
675
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RBCAA's Valuation (76) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NWFL (92). This means that RBCAA’s stock grew similarly to NWFL’s over the last 12 months.

RBCAA's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NWFL (54). This means that RBCAA’s stock grew somewhat faster than NWFL’s over the last 12 months.

RBCAA's SMR Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NWFL (73). This means that RBCAA’s stock grew somewhat faster than NWFL’s over the last 12 months.

NWFL's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RBCAA (50). This means that NWFL’s stock grew similarly to RBCAA’s over the last 12 months.

NWFL's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for RBCAA (75). This means that NWFL’s stock grew significantly faster than RBCAA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NWFLRBCAA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
53%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NWFL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RBCAA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NWAMX39.150.35
+0.90%
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Eq Inc K
MYIFX18.870.02
+0.11%
Monetta Young Investor Growth
FMCCX50.79N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selec Mid Cp I
SUHIX45.88-1.89
-3.96%
DWS Health and Wellness Inst
ODVNX32.14-14.48
-31.06%
Invesco Developing Markets R

NWFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWFL has been loosely correlated with FNLC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NWFL jumps, then FNLC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWFL
1D Price
Change %
NWFL100%
+2.27%
FNLC - NWFL
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.40%
FDBC - NWFL
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
PFIS - NWFL
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
GABC - NWFL
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
RBCAA - NWFL
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
More

RBCAA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBCAA has been closely correlated with CTBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RBCAA jumps, then CTBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBCAA
1D Price
Change %
RBCAA100%
+1.15%
CTBI - RBCAA
84%
Closely correlated
+1.21%
PEBO - RBCAA
83%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
FCBC - RBCAA
82%
Closely correlated
+1.51%
FMBH - RBCAA
82%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
GSBC - RBCAA
81%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
More