NWFL
Price
$29.97
Change
-$0.28 (-0.93%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
277.65M
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RAIFF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
14.25B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NWFL vs RAIFF

Header iconNWFL vs RAIFF Comparison
Open Charts NWFL vs RAIFFBanner chart's image
Norwood Financial
Price$29.97
Change-$0.28 (-0.93%)
Volume$40.33K
Capitalization277.65M
Raiffeisen Bank International AG
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$500
Capitalization14.25B
NWFL vs RAIFF Comparison Chart in %
NWFL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RAIFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NWFL vs. RAIFF commentary
Dec 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWFL is a StrongBuy and RAIFF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 13, 2025
Stock price -- (NWFL: $30.25 vs. RAIFF: $36.08)
Brand notoriety: NWFL and RAIFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NWFL: 135% vs. RAIFF: 100%
Market capitalization -- NWFL: $277.65M vs. RAIFF: $14.25B
NWFL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $277.65M. RAIFF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $14.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NWFL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRAIFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NWFL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RAIFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RAIFF is a better buy in the long-term than NWFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NWFL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RAIFF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NWFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RAIFF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RAIFF is a better buy in the short-term than NWFL.

Price Growth

NWFL (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.14% price change this week, while RAIFF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

NWFL is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RAIFF($14.3B) has a higher market cap than NWFL($278M). NWFL has higher P/E ratio than RAIFF: NWFL (46.11) vs RAIFF (14.72). RAIFF YTD gains are higher at: 93.018 vs. NWFL (16.908). NWFL has less debt than RAIFF: NWFL (72.1M) vs RAIFF (21.2B). RAIFF has higher revenues than NWFL: RAIFF (9.18B) vs NWFL (63.5M).
NWFLRAIFFNWFL / RAIFF
Capitalization278M14.3B2%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.90893.01818%
P/E Ratio46.1114.72313%
Revenue63.5M9.18B1%
Total Cash32.1MN/A-
Total Debt72.1M21.2B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NWFL vs RAIFF: Fundamental Ratings
NWFL
RAIFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2849
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5435
SMR RATING
1..100
736
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4640
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6511

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RAIFF's Valuation (61) in the null industry is in the same range as NWFL (92) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RAIFF’s stock grew similarly to NWFL’s over the last 12 months.

RAIFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as NWFL (54) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RAIFF’s stock grew similarly to NWFL’s over the last 12 months.

RAIFF's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NWFL (73) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RAIFF’s stock grew significantly faster than NWFL’s over the last 12 months.

RAIFF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as NWFL (46) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RAIFF’s stock grew similarly to NWFL’s over the last 12 months.

RAIFF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as NWFL (6) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RAIFF’s stock grew similarly to NWFL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NWFLRAIFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
53%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NWFL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RAIFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MGYOY4.620.23
+5.24%
MOL Magyar Olaj-Es Gazipari RT
SCGLY15.280.32
+2.14%
Societe Generale
SOSCF0.25N/A
N/A
Deoleo SA
BLTMF0.09N/A
N/A
Orbec Gold Mines Inc.
KMMPF11.78N/A
N/A
Killiam Apt Real Estate Invt Tr

NWFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWFL has been loosely correlated with FNLC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NWFL jumps, then FNLC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWFL
1D Price
Change %
NWFL100%
+2.27%
FNLC - NWFL
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.40%
FDBC - NWFL
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
PFIS - NWFL
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
GABC - NWFL
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
RBCAA - NWFL
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
More

RAIFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RAIFF and IITSF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RAIFF and IITSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RAIFF
1D Price
Change %
RAIFF100%
N/A
IITSF - RAIFF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
UBFO - RAIFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.29%