Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCFX vs VIGRX
NWCFX vs VIGRX Comparison
Open Charts NWCFX vs VIGRX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
Price$67.83
Change-$0.30 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets845.19M
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$238.18
Change-$0.71 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.49B
NWCFX vs VIGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCFX vs. VIGRX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCFX is a Buy and VIGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. NWCFX (845M). VIGRX pays higher dividends than NWCFX: VIGRX (0.32) vs NWCFX (0.00). NWCFX was incepted earlier than VIGRX: NWCFX (12 years) vs VIGRX (33 years). NWCFX (0.69) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. VIGRX (11.00). VIGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: VIGRX (3000) vs NWCFX (1000000). VIGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.21 vs. NWCFX (6.22). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 100.96 vs. NWCFX (28.54).
| NWCFX | VIGRX | NWCFX / VIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.17 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.17 | 406% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.320 | 12.727 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 845M | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.32 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.22 | 27.21 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.32 | 96.74 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.54 | 100.96 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.21 | 347.40 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement