Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCFX vs RGAGX
NWCFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NWCFX vs RGAGX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
Price$68.60
Change+$0.29 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets901.36M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$84.69
Change+$0.07 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
NWCFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCFX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. NWCFX (901M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NWCFX: RGAGX (0.61) vs NWCFX (0.00). NWCFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NWCFX (12 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). NWCFX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: RGAGX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.07 vs. NWCFX (6.74). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 48.41 vs. NWCFX (39.43).
| NWCFX | RGAGX | NWCFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.30 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.30 | 230% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.550 | 13.602 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 901M | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.61 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.74 | 17.07 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.98 | 50.31 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.43 | 48.41 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.05 | 88.11 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement