Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCFX vs RGAGX
NWCFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NWCFX vs RGAGX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
Price$67.83
Change-$0.30 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets845.19M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$86.49
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
NWCFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCFX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. NWCFX (845M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NWCFX: RGAGX (0.59) vs NWCFX (0.00). NWCFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NWCFX (12 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). NWCFX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: RGAGX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.90 vs. NWCFX (6.22). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 44.13 vs. NWCFX (28.54).
| NWCFX | RGAGX | NWCFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.30 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.30 | 230% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.320 | 16.016 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 845M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.59 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.22 | 18.90 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.32 | 61.40 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.54 | 44.13 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.21 | 102.81 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement