Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCFX vs RGACX
NWCFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NWCFX vs RGACX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
Price$70.28
Change+$0.28 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets868.68M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.70
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
NWCFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCFX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCFX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. NWCFX (869M). RGACX pays higher dividends than NWCFX: RGACX (0.07) vs NWCFX (0.00). NWCFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NWCFX (13 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than NWCFX (0.69). NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: RGACX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.01 vs. NWCFX (2.51). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.85 vs. NWCFX (29.64).
| NWCFX | RGACX | NWCFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.94 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.94 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.233 | 17.655 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 869M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.51 | 11.01 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.27 | 70.57 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.64 | 37.85 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.35 | 96.78 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement