Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCFX vs RGACX
NWCFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NWCFX vs RGACX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
Price$71.20
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets870.28M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$86.23
Change+$0.52 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
NWCFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCFX vs. RGACX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCFX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. NWCFX (870M). RGACX pays higher dividends than NWCFX: RGACX (0.07) vs NWCFX (0.00). NWCFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NWCFX (13 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than NWCFX (0.69). NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: RGACX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.46 vs. NWCFX (-1.56). NWCFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.58 vs. RGACX (29.83).
| NWCFX | RGACX | NWCFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.94 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.94 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.175 | 18.558 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 870M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.56 | 6.46 | -24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.08 | 60.09 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.58 | 29.83 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.13 | 89.90 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement