Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCFX vs RGACX
NWCFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NWCFX vs RGACX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
Price$59.00
Change+$0.05 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets859.37M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$78.33
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
NWCFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCFX vs. RGACX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCFX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. NWCFX (859M). RGACX pays higher dividends than NWCFX: RGACX (0.07) vs NWCFX (0.00). NWCFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NWCFX (13 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than NWCFX (0.67). NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: RGACX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.45 vs. NWCFX (-8.81). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 20.43 vs. NWCFX (9.36).
| NWCFX | RGACX | NWCFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.93 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.93 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.781 | 8.821 | -66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 859M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.81 | 5.45 | -162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.90 | 63.36 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.36 | 20.43 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.58 | 92.34 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement