Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCFX vs RGABX
NWCFX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts NWCFX vs RGABX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
Price$68.60
Change+$0.29 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets901.36M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$74.98
Change+$0.05 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
NWCFX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCFX vs. RGABX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCFX is a Buy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. NWCFX (901M). NWCFX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWCFX was incepted earlier than RGABX: NWCFX (12 years) vs RGABX (23 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than NWCFX (0.69). NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: RGABX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.72 vs. NWCFX (6.74). NWCFX (39.43) and RGABX (38.11) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NWCFX | RGABX | NWCFX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.39 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.39 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.550 | 12.888 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 901M | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.74 | 14.72 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.98 | 43.64 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.43 | 38.11 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.05 | 70.29 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement