Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCFX vs RGABX
NWCFX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts NWCFX vs RGABX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
Price$67.67
Change+$0.84 (+1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets896.6M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$73.55
Change+$0.72 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
NWCFX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCFX vs. RGABX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCFX is a Buy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. NWCFX (897M). NWCFX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWCFX was incepted earlier than RGABX: NWCFX (12 years) vs RGABX (23 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than NWCFX (0.69). NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: RGABX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.04 vs. NWCFX (-1.14). NWCFX (41.63) and RGABX (40.87) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NWCFX | RGABX | NWCFX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.39 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.39 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.065 | 10.735 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 897M | 323B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.14 | 9.04 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.99 | 53.81 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.63 | 40.87 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.20 | 71.21 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement