Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCFX vs RGAAX
NWCFX vs RGAAX Comparison
Open Charts NWCFX vs RGAAX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
Price$63.92
Change-$0.91 (-1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets856.23M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R1
Price$68.39
Change-$0.83 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
NWCFX vs RGAAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCFX vs. RGAAX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCFX is a Buy and RGAAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAAX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. NWCFX (856M). NWCFX (0.00) and RGAAX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWCFX was incepted earlier than RGAAX: NWCFX (12 years) vs RGAAX (23 years). RGAAX (1.38) is less costly to investors than NWCFX (0.69). NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAAX (25.00). RGAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: RGAAX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). RGAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.54 vs. NWCFX (-1.74). NWCFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.93 vs. RGAAX (40.00).
| NWCFX | RGAAX | NWCFX / RGAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.38 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.38 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.076 | 4.700 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 856M | 306B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.74 | 6.54 | -27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.54 | 47.36 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.93 | 40.00 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.68 | 57.62 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement