Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCFX vs RGAAX
NWCFX vs RGAAX Comparison
Open Charts NWCFX vs RGAAX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
Price$67.67
Change+$0.84 (+1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets896.6M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R1
Price$72.34
Change+$0.70 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
NWCFX vs RGAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCFX vs. RGAAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCFX is a Buy and RGAAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAAX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. NWCFX (897M). NWCFX (0.00) and RGAAX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWCFX was incepted earlier than RGAAX: NWCFX (12 years) vs RGAAX (23 years). RGAAX (1.38) is less costly to investors than NWCFX (0.69). NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAAX (25.00). RGAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: RGAAX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). RGAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.90 vs. NWCFX (-1.14). NWCFX (41.63) and RGAAX (40.25) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NWCFX | RGAAX | NWCFX / RGAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.38 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.38 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.065 | 10.747 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 897M | 323B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.14 | 8.90 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.99 | 53.36 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.63 | 40.25 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.20 | 69.73 | 68% |