Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCCX vs RGAGX
NWCCX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NWCCX vs RGAGX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG C
Price$41.10
Change-$0.59 (-1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets856.23M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$78.43
Change-$0.94 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
NWCCX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCCX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCCX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. NWCCX (856M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NWCCX: RGAGX (0.65) vs NWCCX (0.00). NWCCX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NWCCX (16 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). NWCCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). NWCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCCX: RGAGX (250) vs NWCCX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.67 vs. NWCCX (-8.73). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 51.11 vs. NWCCX (15.45).
| NWCCX | RGAGX | NWCCX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.30 | 550% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.30 | 610% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.532 | 5.205 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 856M | 306B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.65 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.73 | 7.67 | -114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.64 | 54.66 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.45 | 51.11 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.79 | 75.62 | -6% |