Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCCX vs RGAGX
NWCCX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NWCCX vs RGAGX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG C
Price$43.89
Change+$0.41 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets901.36M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$84.62
Change+$0.29 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
NWCCX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCCX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCCX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. NWCCX (901M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NWCCX: RGAGX (0.61) vs NWCCX (0.00). NWCCX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NWCCX (16 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). NWCCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). NWCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCCX: RGAGX (250) vs NWCCX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.20 vs. NWCCX (-0.18). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 50.83 vs. NWCCX (14.12).
| NWCCX | RGAGX | NWCCX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.30 | 550% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.30 | 610% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.424 | 13.508 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 901M | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.61 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.18 | 18.20 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.12 | 59.73 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.12 | 50.83 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.66 | 89.40 | -2% |