Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCCX vs RGAFX
NWCCX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts NWCCX vs RGAFX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG C
Price$33.10
Change+$0.03 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets859.37M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$81.33
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
NWCCX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCCX vs. RGAFX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCCX is a Hold and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. NWCCX (859M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than NWCCX: RGAFX (0.53) vs NWCCX (0.00). NWCCX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: NWCCX (17 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). NWCCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). NWCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAFX (32.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCCX: RGAFX (250) vs NWCCX (2500). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.08 vs. NWCCX (-20.87). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 24.03 vs. NWCCX (-21.30).
| NWCCX | RGAFX | NWCCX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.34 | 485% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.34 | 524% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -18.231 | 9.285 | -196% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 859M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.53 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.87 | 6.08 | -343% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.95 | 68.01 | 13% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.30 | 24.03 | -89% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.08 | 97.51 | -13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement