Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCCX vs RGAFX
NWCCX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts NWCCX vs RGAFX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG C
Price$45.04
Change+$0.18 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets868.68M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$87.97
Change+$0.18 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
NWCCX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCCX vs. RGAFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCCX is a Hold and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. NWCCX (869M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than NWCCX: RGAFX (0.53) vs NWCCX (0.00). NWCCX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: NWCCX (16 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). NWCCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). NWCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCCX: RGAFX (250) vs NWCCX (2500). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.94 vs. NWCCX (-4.72). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.66 vs. NWCCX (4.79).
| NWCCX | RGAFX | NWCCX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.34 | 485% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.34 | 538% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.265 | 18.207 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 869M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.53 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.72 | 11.94 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.00 | 73.49 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.79 | 41.66 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.00 | 103.34 | 6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement