Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCCX vs RGACX
NWCCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NWCCX vs RGACX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG C
Price$43.72
Change+$0.38 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets845.19M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
NWCCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCCX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCCX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. NWCCX (845M). RGACX pays higher dividends than NWCCX: RGACX (0.07) vs NWCCX (0.00). NWCCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NWCCX (16 years) vs RGACX (23 years). NWCCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). NWCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCCX: RGACX (250) vs NWCCX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.83 vs. NWCCX (-1.29). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. NWCCX (3.89).
| NWCCX | RGACX | NWCCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.94 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.94 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.510 | 15.516 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 845M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.29 | 17.83 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.20 | 58.53 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.89 | 40.02 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.84 | 95.93 | 4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement