Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCCX vs RGACX
NWCCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NWCCX vs RGACX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG C
Price$43.98
Change-$0.10 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets900.18M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
NWCCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCCX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCCX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. NWCCX (900M). RGACX pays higher dividends than NWCCX: RGACX (0.07) vs NWCCX (0.00). NWCCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NWCCX (16 years) vs RGACX (23 years). NWCCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). NWCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCCX: RGACX (250) vs NWCCX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.08 vs. NWCCX (-3.70). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.95 vs. NWCCX (9.24).
| NWCCX | RGACX | NWCCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.94 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.94 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.646 | 14.044 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 900M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.70 | 14.08 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.42 | 41.19 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.24 | 41.95 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.48 | 83.68 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement