NWCCF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
25.81M
SLVDF
Price
$0.16
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
10.31M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NWCCF vs SLVDF

Header iconNWCCF vs SLVDF Comparison
Open Charts NWCCF vs SLVDFBanner chart's image
NORTHWEST COPPER
Price$0.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$33.05K
Capitalization25.81M
Silver Dollar Resources
Price$0.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$15.8K
Capitalization10.31M
NWCCF vs SLVDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NWCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NWCCF vs. SLVDF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCCF is a Hold and SLVDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (NWCCF: $0.14 vs. SLVDF: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: NWCCF and SLVDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NWCCF: 221% vs. SLVDF: 39%
Market capitalization -- NWCCF: $25.81M vs. SLVDF: $10.31M
NWCCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $25.81M. SLVDF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $10.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NWCCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLVDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NWCCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLVDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NWCCF and SLVDF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NWCCF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLVDF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NWCCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SLVDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLVDF is a better buy in the short-term than NWCCF.

Price Growth

NWCCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +6.15% price change this week, while SLVDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -5.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NWCCF($25.8M) has a higher market cap than SLVDF($10.3M). SLVDF YTD gains are higher at: -14.859 vs. NWCCF (-29.949). SLVDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -483.58K vs. NWCCF (-655.21K). SLVDF has more cash in the bank: 5.29M vs. NWCCF (3.76M). NWCCF (0) and SLVDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
NWCCFSLVDFNWCCF / SLVDF
Capitalization25.8M10.3M250%
EBITDA-655.21K-483.58K135%
Gain YTD-29.949-14.859202%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash3.76M5.29M71%
Total Debt112KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NWCCF: Fundamental Ratings
NWCCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
16
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NWCCFSLVDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NWCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GDQMF0.62N/A
+0.72%
Goldquest Mining Corp.
CTOUF12.66N/A
N/A
Charter Hall Group
EXCOF5.15N/A
N/A
Exco Technologies Ltd.
TKLS0.05N/A
N/A
Trutankless, Inc.
PEGRF6.76-0.15
-2.19%
Pennon Group PLC

NWCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NWCCF and CHXMF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NWCCF and CHXMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWCCF
1D Price
Change %
NWCCF100%
-2.82%
CHXMF - NWCCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
HUSIF - NWCCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
ELMTF - NWCCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMASF - NWCCF
16%
Poorly correlated
-6.15%
SLVDF - NWCCF
12%
Poorly correlated
+2.23%
More

SLVDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLVDF and PGEZF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLVDF and PGEZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLVDF
1D Price
Change %
SLVDF100%
+2.23%
PGEZF - SLVDF
31%
Poorly correlated
+14.75%
LUNMF - SLVDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
AAGFF - SLVDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
AZZTF - SLVDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+6.17%
ESKYF - SLVDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+19.46%
More