NWCCF
Price
$0.21
Change
+$0.01 (+5.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
54.8M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PGXFF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Updated
Nov 10 closing price
Capitalization
1.77M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NWCCF vs PGXFF

Header iconNWCCF vs PGXFF Comparison
Open Charts NWCCF vs PGXFFBanner chart's image
NORTHWEST COPPER
Price$0.21
Change+$0.01 (+5.00%)
Volume$49.4K
Capitalization54.8M
Prosper Gold
Price$0.02
Change-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Volume$257
Capitalization1.77M
NWCCF vs PGXFF Comparison Chart in %
NWCCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PGXFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NWCCF vs. PGXFF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCCF is a Hold and PGXFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (NWCCF: $0.21 vs. PGXFF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: NWCCF and PGXFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NWCCF: 123% vs. PGXFF: 1%
Market capitalization -- NWCCF: $54.8M vs. PGXFF: $1.77M
NWCCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $54.8M. PGXFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.77M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NWCCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePGXFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NWCCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PGXFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NWCCF is a better buy in the long-term than PGXFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NWCCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PGXFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NWCCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PGXFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both NWCCF and PGXFF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

NWCCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +14.88% price change this week, while PGXFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -23.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +163.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.62% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NWCCF($54.8M) has a higher market cap than PGXFF($1.77M). NWCCF YTD gains are higher at: 3.249 vs. PGXFF (-59.147). PGXFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.08M vs. NWCCF (-3.32M). NWCCF has more cash in the bank: 266K vs. PGXFF (209K). NWCCF (0) and PGXFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
NWCCFPGXFFNWCCF / PGXFF
Capitalization54.8M1.77M3,096%
EBITDA-3.32M-2.08M160%
Gain YTD3.249-59.147-5%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash266K209K127%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NWCCF vs PGXFF: Fundamental Ratings
NWCCF
PGXFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6489
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9298
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4596
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
12100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5022

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PGXFF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NWCCF (98). This means that PGXFF’s stock grew significantly faster than NWCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PGXFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NWCCF (100). This means that PGXFF’s stock grew similarly to NWCCF’s over the last 12 months.

NWCCF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as PGXFF (98). This means that NWCCF’s stock grew similarly to PGXFF’s over the last 12 months.

NWCCF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PGXFF (96). This means that NWCCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PGXFF’s over the last 12 months.

NWCCF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PGXFF (100). This means that NWCCF’s stock grew significantly faster than PGXFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NWCCFPGXFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
79%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NWCCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PGXFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALB110.326.44
+6.20%
Albemarle Corp
EOLS7.300.31
+4.43%
Evolus
SFWL1.000.01
+1.11%
Shengfeng Development Limited
JZ1.40N/A
N/A
Jianzhi Education Technology Group Company Limited
IVT28.02-0.04
-0.14%
InvenTrust Properties Corp

NWCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NWCCF and LITM have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NWCCF and LITM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWCCF
1D Price
Change %
NWCCF100%
+5.82%
LITM - NWCCF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
CHXMF - NWCCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.01%
SLVDF - NWCCF
13%
Poorly correlated
+9.44%
LTSRF - NWCCF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
LGO - NWCCF
9%
Poorly correlated
-3.51%
More

PGXFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PGXFF and LLLAF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGXFF and LLLAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGXFF
1D Price
Change %
PGXFF100%
N/A
LLLAF - PGXFF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGO - PGXFF
8%
Poorly correlated
-3.51%
SLVDF - PGXFF
3%
Poorly correlated
+9.44%
NWCCF - PGXFF
3%
Poorly correlated
+5.82%
KLDCF - PGXFF
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.23%
More