Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCAX vs RGAGX
NWCAX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NWCAX vs RGAGX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$62.74
Change-$1.31 (-2.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets864.14M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$87.53
Change-$1.95 (-2.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
NWCAX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCAX vs. RGAGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCAX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. NWCAX (864M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NWCAX: RGAGX (0.56) vs NWCAX (0.00). NWCAX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NWCAX (17 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). NWCAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: RGAGX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.29 vs. NWCAX (-1.97). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 41.96 vs. NWCAX (25.39).
| NWCAX | RGAGX | NWCAX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.30 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.30 | 360% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.600 | 20.027 | 73% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 864M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.56 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.97 | 9.29 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.14 | 66.31 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.39 | 41.96 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.33 | 105.33 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement