Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCAX vs RGAGX
NWCAX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NWCAX vs RGAGX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$48.25
Change-$15.65 (-24.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets825.35M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$79.78
Change-$9.68 (-10.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
NWCAX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCAX vs. RGAGX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCAX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. NWCAX (825M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NWCAX: RGAGX (0.55) vs NWCAX (0.00). NWCAX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NWCAX (17 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). NWCAX (1.03) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: RGAGX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.12 vs. NWCAX (-14.90). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 15.21 vs. NWCAX (-8.37).
| NWCAX | RGAGX | NWCAX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.29 | 310% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.29 | 355% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.056 | -0.981 | 414% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 825M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.55 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.90 | 3.12 | -478% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.70 | 46.56 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.37 | 15.21 | -55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.00 | 123.51 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement