Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCAX vs RGAGX
NWCAX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NWCAX vs RGAGX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$63.35
Change-$0.08 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets870.28M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$89.83
Change+$0.54 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
NWCAX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCAX vs. RGAGX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCAX is a StrongBuy and RGAGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. NWCAX (870M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NWCAX: RGAGX (0.57) vs NWCAX (0.00). NWCAX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NWCAX (17 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). NWCAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: RGAGX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.42 vs. NWCAX (-3.25). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. NWCAX (28.80).
| NWCAX | RGAGX | NWCAX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.30 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.30 | 360% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.829 | 19.262 | 67% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 870M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.57 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.25 | 7.42 | -44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.57 | 63.01 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.80 | 33.65 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.91 | 96.59 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement