Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCAX vs RGAGX
NWCAX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NWCAX vs RGAGX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$60.28
Change+$0.74 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets896.6M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$83.01
Change+$0.81 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
NWCAX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCAX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCAX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. NWCAX (897M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NWCAX: RGAGX (0.61) vs NWCAX (0.00). NWCAX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NWCAX (16 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). NWCAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: RGAGX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.27 vs. NWCAX (-2.88). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 51.38 vs. NWCAX (33.99).
| NWCAX | RGAGX | NWCAX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.30 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.30 | 360% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.855 | 11.348 | 69% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 897M | 323B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.61 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.88 | 11.27 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.17 | 60.98 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.99 | 51.38 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.01 | 89.12 | 37% |