Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCAX vs RGAFX
NWCAX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts NWCAX vs RGAFX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$60.40
Change-$0.26 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets845.19M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$86.32
Change+$0.21 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
NWCAX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCAX vs. RGAFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCAX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. NWCAX (845M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than NWCAX: RGAFX (0.55) vs NWCAX (0.00). NWCAX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: NWCAX (16 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). NWCAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: RGAFX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.84 vs. NWCAX (4.37). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.89 vs. NWCAX (21.68).
| NWCAX | RGAFX | NWCAX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.34 | 265% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.34 | 318% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.069 | 15.990 | 50% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 845M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.55 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.37 | 18.84 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.64 | 61.27 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.68 | 43.89 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.68 | 102.47 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement