Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCAX vs RGAFX
NWCAX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts NWCAX vs RGAFX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$62.74
Change-$1.31 (-2.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets864.14M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$87.34
Change-$1.95 (-2.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
NWCAX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCAX vs. RGAFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCAX is a Hold and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. NWCAX (864M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than NWCAX: RGAFX (0.52) vs NWCAX (0.00). NWCAX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: NWCAX (17 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). NWCAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: RGAFX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.22 vs. NWCAX (-1.97). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.72 vs. NWCAX (25.39).
| NWCAX | RGAFX | NWCAX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.34 | 265% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.34 | 318% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.600 | 19.981 | 73% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 864M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.52 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.97 | 9.22 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.14 | 66.11 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.39 | 41.72 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.33 | 104.95 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement