Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCAX vs RGAFX
NWCAX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts NWCAX vs RGAFX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$63.35
Change-$0.08 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets870.28M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$89.63
Change+$0.54 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
NWCAX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCAX vs. RGAFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCAX is a StrongBuy and RGAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. NWCAX (870M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than NWCAX: RGAFX (0.53) vs NWCAX (0.00). NWCAX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: NWCAX (17 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). NWCAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: RGAFX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.35 vs. NWCAX (-3.25). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.41 vs. NWCAX (28.80).
| NWCAX | RGAFX | NWCAX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.34 | 265% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.34 | 318% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.829 | 19.202 | 67% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 870M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.53 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.25 | 7.35 | -44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.57 | 62.82 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.80 | 33.41 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.91 | 96.19 | 35% |