Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCAX vs RGAFX
NWCAX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts NWCAX vs RGAFX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$48.25
Change-$15.65 (-24.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets825.35M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$79.62
Change-$9.66 (-10.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
NWCAX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCAX vs. RGAFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCAX is a Hold and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. NWCAX (825M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than NWCAX: RGAFX (0.50) vs NWCAX (0.00). NWCAX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: NWCAX (17 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). NWCAX (1.03) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAFX (32.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: RGAFX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.03 vs. NWCAX (-14.90). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.93 vs. NWCAX (-8.37).
| NWCAX | RGAFX | NWCAX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.34 | 265% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.34 | 303% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.056 | -0.995 | 408% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 825M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.90 | 3.03 | -491% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.70 | 46.30 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.37 | 14.93 | -56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.00 | 122.97 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement