Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCAX vs RGABX
NWCAX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts NWCAX vs RGABX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$63.35
Change-$0.08 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets870.28M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$79.23
Change+$0.47 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
NWCAX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCAX vs. RGABX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCAX is a StrongBuy and RGABX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. NWCAX (870M). NWCAX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWCAX was incepted earlier than RGABX: NWCAX (17 years) vs RGABX (24 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than NWCAX (1.08). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: RGABX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.29 vs. NWCAX (-3.25). NWCAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.80 vs. RGABX (24.39).
| NWCAX | RGABX | NWCAX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.39 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.39 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.829 | 18.082 | 71% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 870M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.25 | 5.29 | -61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.57 | 55.80 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.80 | 24.39 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.91 | 77.97 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement