Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCAX vs RGABX
NWCAX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts NWCAX vs RGABX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$48.25
Change-$15.65 (-24.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets825.35M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$69.68
Change-$9.36 (-11.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
NWCAX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCAX vs. RGABX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCAX is a Hold and RGABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. NWCAX (825M). NWCAX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWCAX was incepted earlier than RGABX: NWCAX (17 years) vs RGABX (24 years). RGABX (1.38) is less costly to investors than NWCAX (1.03). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGABX (32.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: RGABX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.62 vs. NWCAX (-14.90). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 5.53 vs. NWCAX (-8.37).
| NWCAX | RGABX | NWCAX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.38 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.38 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.056 | -1.079 | 376% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 825M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.90 | 0.62 | -2,400% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.70 | 37.71 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.37 | 5.53 | -151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.00 | 98.35 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement