Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCAX vs RGABX
NWCAX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts NWCAX vs RGABX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$62.74
Change-$1.31 (-2.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets864.14M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$77.25
Change-$1.73 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
NWCAX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCAX vs. RGABX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCAX is a Hold and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. NWCAX (864M). NWCAX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWCAX was incepted earlier than RGABX: NWCAX (17 years) vs RGABX (24 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than NWCAX (1.08). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: RGABX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.12 vs. NWCAX (-1.97). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 32.14 vs. NWCAX (25.39).
| NWCAX | RGABX | NWCAX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.39 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.39 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.600 | 18.910 | 77% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 864M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.97 | 7.12 | -28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.14 | 58.91 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.39 | 32.14 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.33 | 85.88 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement