Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWCAX vs RGAAX
NWCAX vs RGAAX Comparison
Open Charts NWCAX vs RGAAX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$51.07
Change+$0.05 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets859.37M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R1
Price$69.93
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
NWCAX vs RGAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWCAX vs. RGAAX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWCAX is a Hold and RGAAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAAX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. NWCAX (859M). NWCAX (0.00) and RGAAX (0.00) have matching dividends . NWCAX was incepted earlier than RGAAX: NWCAX (17 years) vs RGAAX (24 years). RGAAX (1.37) is less costly to investors than NWCAX (1.03). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAAX (32.00). RGAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: RGAAX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). RGAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.89 vs. NWCAX (-11.57). RGAAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.78 vs. NWCAX (1.09).
| NWCAX | RGAAX | NWCAX / RGAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.37 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.37 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.624 | 7.058 | -122% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 859M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.57 | 3.89 | -297% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.48 | 58.25 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.09 | 13.78 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.79 | 74.87 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement