NWARF
Price
$1.37
Change
+$0.02 (+1.48%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.53B
QUBSF
Price
$6.50
Change
+$0.20 (+3.17%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
10.53B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NWARF vs QUBSF

Header iconNWARF vs QUBSF Comparison
Open Charts NWARF vs QUBSFBanner chart's image
Norwegian Air Shuttle Asa
Price$1.37
Change+$0.02 (+1.48%)
Volume$1.54K
Capitalization1.53B
Qantas Airways
Price$6.50
Change+$0.20 (+3.17%)
Volume$1.88K
Capitalization10.53B
NWARF vs QUBSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NWARF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QUBSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NWARF vs. QUBSF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWARF is a Hold and QUBSF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (NWARF: $1.37 vs. QUBSF: $6.50)
Brand notoriety: NWARF and QUBSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Airlines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NWARF: 18% vs. QUBSF: 73%
Market capitalization -- NWARF: $1.53B vs. QUBSF: $10.53B
NWARF [@Airlines] is valued at $1.53B. QUBSF’s [@Airlines] market capitalization is $10.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Airlines] industry ranges from $33.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Airlines] industry is $7.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NWARF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQUBSF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • NWARF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QUBSF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, QUBSF is a better buy in the long-term than NWARF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NWARF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QUBSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NWARF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • QUBSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NWARF is a better buy in the short-term than QUBSF.

Price Growth

NWARF (@Airlines) experienced а +3.01% price change this week, while QUBSF (@Airlines) price change was +3.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Airlines industry was +2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.35%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Airlines (+2.06% weekly)

Airlines industry comprises passenger air transportation, including scheduled and non-scheduled routes. This can include charter airlines, as well as regular commuter ones. Discount pricing and the rise of low-cost carriers over recent decades have expanded the industry by making its services accessible to a much larger global population, compared to the older days when airline travel was a relative luxury for many people in the world. Delta Air Lines Inc., Southwest Airlines Co and United Continental Holdings, Inc. are some of the airlines with the largest stock market capitalizations in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QUBSF($10.5B) has a higher market cap than NWARF($1.53B). QUBSF has higher P/E ratio than NWARF: QUBSF (11.93) vs NWARF (10.23). NWARF YTD gains are higher at: 41.179 vs. QUBSF (25.386). NWARF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.04B vs. QUBSF (4.2B). NWARF has higher revenues than QUBSF: NWARF (35.8B) vs QUBSF (22.6B).
NWARFQUBSFNWARF / QUBSF
Capitalization1.53B10.5B15%
EBITDA7.04B4.2B168%
Gain YTD41.17925.386162%
P/E Ratio10.2311.9386%
Revenue35.8B22.6B158%
Total Cash10.5BN/A-
Total Debt15.5BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NWARF vs QUBSF: Fundamental Ratings
NWARF
QUBSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10015
SMR RATING
1..100
4110
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4544
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2110
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QUBSF's Valuation (77) in the null industry is in the same range as NWARF (84). This means that QUBSF’s stock grew similarly to NWARF’s over the last 12 months.

QUBSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NWARF (100). This means that QUBSF’s stock grew significantly faster than NWARF’s over the last 12 months.

QUBSF's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as NWARF (41). This means that QUBSF’s stock grew similarly to NWARF’s over the last 12 months.

QUBSF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as NWARF (45). This means that QUBSF’s stock grew similarly to NWARF’s over the last 12 months.

QUBSF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as NWARF (21). This means that QUBSF’s stock grew similarly to NWARF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NWARFQUBSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NWARF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QUBSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FAVFX35.790.16
+0.45%
Fidelity Advisor Value A
GBLCX39.810.15
+0.38%
American Funds Global Balanced C
ALPAX10.720.04
+0.37%
American Century Focused Lg Cap Val A
OAIEX14.880.05
+0.34%
Optimum International A
DHPIX17.800.05
+0.28%
Diamond Hill Mid Cap I

NWARF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NWARF and QABSY have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NWARF and QABSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWARF
1D Price
Change %
NWARF100%
+1.48%
QABSY - NWARF
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
JETMF - NWARF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.17%
QUBSF - NWARF
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.17%
JAPSY - NWARF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
HRBR - NWARF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

QUBSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QUBSF and QABSY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QUBSF and QABSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QUBSF
1D Price
Change %
QUBSF100%
+3.17%
QABSY - QUBSF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
RYAOF - QUBSF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWARF - QUBSF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
JETMF - QUBSF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.17%
JPNRF - QUBSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More