NWARF
Price
$1.56
Change
-$0.06 (-3.70%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.77B
QUBSF
Price
$6.74
Change
-$0.12 (-1.75%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
10.83B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NWARF vs QUBSF

Header iconNWARF vs QUBSF Comparison
Open Charts NWARF vs QUBSFBanner chart's image
Norwegian Air Shuttle Asa
Price$1.56
Change-$0.06 (-3.70%)
Volume$18.72K
Capitalization1.77B
Qantas Airways
Price$6.74
Change-$0.12 (-1.75%)
Volume$554
Capitalization10.83B
NWARF vs QUBSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NWARF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QUBSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NWARF vs. QUBSF commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWARF is a Hold and QUBSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (NWARF: $1.56 vs. QUBSF: $6.74)
Brand notoriety: NWARF and QUBSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Airlines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NWARF: 237% vs. QUBSF: 24%
Market capitalization -- NWARF: $1.77B vs. QUBSF: $10.83B
NWARF [@Airlines] is valued at $1.77B. QUBSF’s [@Airlines] market capitalization is $10.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Airlines] industry ranges from $35.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Airlines] industry is $7.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NWARF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQUBSF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • NWARF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QUBSF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, QUBSF is a better buy in the long-term than NWARF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NWARF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QUBSF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NWARF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • QUBSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NWARF is a better buy in the short-term than QUBSF.

Price Growth

NWARF (@Airlines) experienced а -9.30% price change this week, while QUBSF (@Airlines) price change was -4.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Airlines industry was +0.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Airlines (+0.59% weekly)

Airlines industry comprises passenger air transportation, including scheduled and non-scheduled routes. This can include charter airlines, as well as regular commuter ones. Discount pricing and the rise of low-cost carriers over recent decades have expanded the industry by making its services accessible to a much larger global population, compared to the older days when airline travel was a relative luxury for many people in the world. Delta Air Lines Inc., Southwest Airlines Co and United Continental Holdings, Inc. are some of the airlines with the largest stock market capitalizations in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QUBSF($10.8B) has a higher market cap than NWARF($1.77B). QUBSF has higher P/E ratio than NWARF: QUBSF (12.33) vs NWARF (8.61). NWARF YTD gains are higher at: 60.758 vs. QUBSF (30.015). NWARF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.04B vs. QUBSF (4.2B). NWARF has higher revenues than QUBSF: NWARF (35.8B) vs QUBSF (22.6B).
NWARFQUBSFNWARF / QUBSF
Capitalization1.77B10.8B16%
EBITDA7.04B4.2B168%
Gain YTD60.75830.015202%
P/E Ratio8.6112.3370%
Revenue35.8B22.6B158%
Total Cash10.5BN/A-
Total Debt15.5BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NWARF vs QUBSF: Fundamental Ratings
NWARF
QUBSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10017
SMR RATING
1..100
4110
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3840
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2610
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QUBSF's Valuation (77) in the null industry is in the same range as NWARF (83). This means that QUBSF’s stock grew similarly to NWARF’s over the last 12 months.

QUBSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NWARF (100). This means that QUBSF’s stock grew significantly faster than NWARF’s over the last 12 months.

QUBSF's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as NWARF (41). This means that QUBSF’s stock grew similarly to NWARF’s over the last 12 months.

NWARF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as QUBSF (40). This means that NWARF’s stock grew similarly to QUBSF’s over the last 12 months.

QUBSF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as NWARF (26). This means that QUBSF’s stock grew similarly to NWARF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NWARFQUBSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NWARF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QUBSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSSVX7.990.07
+0.88%
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth N
PEMGX46.270.32
+0.70%
Principal MidCap A
IRMAX9.950.06
+0.61%
Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Port A
MLRKX22.790.09
+0.40%
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Core K
MSGCX10.730.02
+0.19%
Meridian Small Cap Growth C

NWARF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NWARF and QABSY have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NWARF and QABSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWARF
1D Price
Change %
NWARF100%
-3.41%
QABSY - NWARF
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
JETMF - NWARF
9%
Poorly correlated
-3.41%
QUBSF - NWARF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JAPSY - NWARF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
HRBR - NWARF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

QUBSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QUBSF and QABSY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QUBSF and QABSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QUBSF
1D Price
Change %
QUBSF100%
N/A
QABSY - QUBSF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
RYAOF - QUBSF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWARF - QUBSF
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.41%
JETMF - QUBSF
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.41%
JPNRF - QUBSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More