NWARF
Price
$1.66
Change
-$0.03 (-1.79%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
1.83B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QABSY
Price
$32.77
Change
-$0.05 (-0.15%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
9.94B
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NWARF vs QABSY

Header iconNWARF vs QABSY Comparison
Open Charts NWARF vs QABSYBanner chart's image
Norwegian Air Shuttle Asa
Price$1.66
Change-$0.03 (-1.79%)
Volume$334
Capitalization1.83B
Qantas Airways
Price$32.77
Change-$0.05 (-0.15%)
Volume$36.56K
Capitalization9.94B
NWARF vs QABSY Comparison Chart in %
NWARF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QABSY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
published Highlights

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are Delta Air Lines (NYSE:DAL), United Airlines Holdings (NASDAQ:UAL), Southwest Airlines Co (NYSE:LUV), American Airlines Group (NASDAQ:AAL), JetBlue Airways Corp (NASDAQ:JBLU).

Industry description

Airlines industry comprises passenger air transportation, including scheduled and non-scheduled routes. This can include charter airlines, as well as regular commuter ones. Discount pricing and the rise of low-cost carriers over recent decades have expanded the industry by making its services accessible to a much larger global population, compared to the older days when airline travel was a relative luxury for many people in the world. Delta Air Lines Inc., Southwest Airlines Co and United Continental Holdings, Inc. are some of the airlines with the largest stock market capitalizations in the U.S.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Airlines Industry is 8.72B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 9.36K to 45.58B. DAL holds the highest valuation in this group at 45.58B. The lowest valued company is KLMR at 9.36K.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Airlines Industry was 2%. For the same Industry, the average monthly price growth was 3%, and the average quarterly price growth was 18%. AIABF experienced the highest price growth at 29%, while FLYYQ experienced the biggest fall at -25%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Airlines Industry was 12%. For the same stocks of the Industry, the average monthly volume growth was 61% and the average quarterly volume growth was -15%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 55
P/E Growth Rating: 58
Price Growth Rating: 50
SMR Rating: 63
Profit Risk Rating: 74
Seasonality Score: 19 (-100 ... +100)

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the group is 5.83B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 1.79B to 9.86B. QABSY holds the highest valuation in this group at 9.86B. The lowest valued company is NWARF at 1.79B.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was 4%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was 7%, and the average quarterly price growth was 17%. NWARF experienced the highest price growth at 6%, while QABSY experienced the biggest fall at 2%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 125%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 98% and the average quarterly volume growth was 240%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 68
P/E Growth Rating: 52
Price Growth Rating: 49
SMR Rating: 19
Profit Risk Rating: 63
Seasonality Score: 22 (-100 ... +100)
VS
NWARF vs. QABSY commentary
Dec 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWARF is a StrongBuy and QABSY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 14, 2025
Stock price -- (NWARF: $1.68 vs. QABSY: $32.83)
Brand notoriety: NWARF and QABSY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Airlines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NWARF: 12% vs. QABSY: 199%
Market capitalization -- NWARF: $1.83B vs. QABSY: $9.94B
NWARF [@Airlines] is valued at $1.83B. QABSY’s [@Airlines] market capitalization is $9.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Airlines] industry ranges from $45.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Airlines] industry is $8.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NWARF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileQABSY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NWARF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • QABSY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NWARF is a better buy in the long-term than QABSY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NWARF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QABSY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NWARF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • QABSY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NWARF is a better buy in the short-term than QABSY.

Price Growth

NWARF (@Airlines) experienced а +6.33% price change this week, while QABSY (@Airlines) price change was +1.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Airlines industry was +1.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

QABSY is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Airlines (+1.92% weekly)

Airlines industry comprises passenger air transportation, including scheduled and non-scheduled routes. This can include charter airlines, as well as regular commuter ones. Discount pricing and the rise of low-cost carriers over recent decades have expanded the industry by making its services accessible to a much larger global population, compared to the older days when airline travel was a relative luxury for many people in the world. Delta Air Lines Inc., Southwest Airlines Co and United Continental Holdings, Inc. are some of the airlines with the largest stock market capitalizations in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QABSY($9.94B) has a higher market cap than NWARF($1.83B). QABSY has higher P/E ratio than NWARF: QABSY (9.44) vs NWARF (7.32). NWARF YTD gains are higher at: 73.124 vs. QABSY (23.945). NWARF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.33B vs. QABSY (4.54B). NWARF has higher revenues than QABSY: NWARF (37.4B) vs QABSY (23.4B).
NWARFQABSYNWARF / QABSY
Capitalization1.83B9.94B18%
EBITDA8.33B4.54B184%
Gain YTD73.12423.945305%
P/E Ratio7.329.4478%
Revenue37.4B23.4B160%
Total Cash10.5BN/A-
Total Debt18.9BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NWARF vs QABSY: Fundamental Ratings
NWARF
QABSY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
248
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10026
SMR RATING
1..100
309
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4058
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3173
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NWARF's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as QABSY (71). This means that NWARF’s stock grew similarly to QABSY’s over the last 12 months.

QABSY's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NWARF (100). This means that QABSY’s stock grew significantly faster than NWARF’s over the last 12 months.

QABSY's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as NWARF (30). This means that QABSY’s stock grew similarly to NWARF’s over the last 12 months.

NWARF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as QABSY (58). This means that NWARF’s stock grew similarly to QABSY’s over the last 12 months.

NWARF's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QABSY (73). This means that NWARF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QABSY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NWARFQABSY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NWARF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QABSY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KMID24.790.29
+1.18%
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF
EWG42.390.45
+1.07%
iShares MSCI Germany ETF
CMCI26.330.17
+0.64%
VanEck® CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF
VFMV132.870.78
+0.59%
Vanguard US Minimum Volatility ETF
EINC96.940.27
+0.28%
VanEck Energy Income ETF

NWARF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NWARF and LUV have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NWARF and LUV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWARF
1D Price
Change %
NWARF100%
-0.59%
LUV - NWARF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.28%
ALGT - NWARF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.01%
ICAGY - NWARF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.61%
QABSY - NWARF
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
JETMF - NWARF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.54%
More

QABSY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QABSY has been loosely correlated with SINGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QABSY jumps, then SINGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QABSY
1D Price
Change %
QABSY100%
+0.86%
SINGY - QABSY
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
DLAKY - QABSY
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
ICAGY - QABSY
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.61%
CPA - QABSY
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.10%
JAPSY - QABSY
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
More