Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWAMX vs RMFCX
NWAMX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NWAMX vs RMFCX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Eq Inc K
Price$36.15
Change+$0.23 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets720.46M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
NWAMX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWAMX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWAMX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. NWAMX (720M). NWAMX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: NWAMX (1.59) vs RMFCX (1.27). NWAMX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NWAMX (38 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than NWAMX (0.80). NWAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWAMX: RMFCX (250) vs NWAMX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. NWAMX (2.83). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.83 vs. NWAMX (41.45).
| NWAMX | RMFCX | NWAMX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.047 | 9.596 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 720M | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 1.27 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.83 | 11.47 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.60 | 29.27 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.45 | 61.83 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.02 | 79.21 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement