Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWAMX vs RMFCX
NWAMX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NWAMX vs RMFCX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Eq Inc K
Price$38.34
Change+$0.43 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets760.57M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.49
Change+$0.31 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
NWAMX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWAMX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWAMX is a Buy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. NWAMX (761M). NWAMX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: NWAMX (1.45) vs RMFCX (1.18). NWAMX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NWAMX (38 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than NWAMX (0.80). NWAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWAMX: RMFCX (250) vs NWAMX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.51 vs. NWAMX (-6.19). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.85 vs. NWAMX (20.99).
| NWAMX | RMFCX | NWAMX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.045 | 14.983 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 761M | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 1.18 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.19 | 5.51 | -112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.83 | 27.11 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.99 | 52.85 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.42 | 89.59 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement