Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWALX vs RWMHX
NWALX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts NWALX vs RWMHX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Eq Inc A
Price$37.47
Change-$0.43 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets748.75M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$66.73
Change-$0.95 (-1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.34B
NWALX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWALX vs. RWMHX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWALX is a StrongBuy and RWMHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. NWALX (749M). NWALX (1.34) and RWMHX (1.33) have matching dividends . NWALX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: NWALX (6 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). NWALX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). NWALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWALX: RWMHX (250) vs NWALX (2000). RWMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.16 vs. NWALX (-4.67). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 46.83 vs. NWALX (26.54).
| NWALX | RWMHX | NWALX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.41 | 268% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.41 | 293% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.622 | 11.375 | 137% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 749M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.33 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.67 | 5.16 | -90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.02 | 32.41 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.54 | 46.83 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement