Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWAHX vs VFWPX
NWAHX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts NWAHX vs VFWPX
Nationwide Janus Henderson Overseas R6
Price$23.10
Change+$0.04 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.82M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$145.32
Change+$0.81 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.34B
NWAHX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWAHX vs. VFWPX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWAHX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 71.3B vs. NWAHX (23.8M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than NWAHX: VFWPX (2.68) vs NWAHX (1.13). NWAHX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: NWAHX (11 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). NWAHX (1.16) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). NWAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). NWAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: NWAHX (1000000) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.96 vs. NWAHX (14.25). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 40.89 vs. NWAHX (1.71).
| NWAHX | VFWPX | NWAHX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.03 | 2,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.03 | 3,867% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.272 | 21.701 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.8M | 71.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 2.68 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.25 | 15.96 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.68 | 47.91 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.71 | 40.89 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.52 | 69.76 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement