Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWAGX vs VTPSX
NWAGX vs VTPSX Comparison
Open Charts NWAGX vs VTPSX
Nationwide Janus Henderson Overseas A
Price$22.70
Change-$0.04 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.86M
Vanguard Total Intl Stock Idx InstlPls
Price$151.41
Change-$0.27 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets510.79B
NWAGX vs VTPSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWAGX vs. VTPSX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWAGX is a StrongBuy and VTPSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTPSX has more cash in the bank: 511B vs. NWAGX (23.9M). VTPSX pays higher dividends than NWAGX: VTPSX (2.83) vs NWAGX (1.02). NWAGX was incepted earlier than VTPSX: NWAGX (10 years) vs VTPSX (15 years). NWAGX (1.52) is less costly to investors than VTPSX (0.05). NWAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. VTPSX (3.00). NWAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTPSX: NWAGX (2000) vs VTPSX (100000000). VTPSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.74 vs. NWAGX (13.36). VTPSX return over 5 years is better than : 42.41 vs. NWAGX (1.67).
| NWAGX | VTPSX | NWAGX / VTPSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.05 | 2,160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.05 | 3,040% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.556 | 19.809 | 89% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.9M | 511B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 2.83 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.36 | 17.74 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.92 | 40.26 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.67 | 42.41 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.07 | 54.24 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement