Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWAGX vs VTMNX
NWAGX vs VTMNX Comparison
Open Charts NWAGX vs VTMNX
Nationwide Janus Henderson Overseas A
Price$18.70
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.76M
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Instl
Price$19.52
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets250.77B
NWAGX vs VTMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWAGX vs. VTMNX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWAGX is a Hold and VTMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTMNX has more cash in the bank: 251B vs. NWAGX (14.8M). VTMNX pays higher dividends than NWAGX: VTMNX (2.80) vs NWAGX (0.70). NWAGX was incepted earlier than VTMNX: NWAGX (11 years) vs VTMNX (25 years). NWAGX (1.52) is less costly to investors than VTMNX (0.03). NWAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. VTMNX (3.00). NWAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTMNX: NWAGX (2000) vs VTMNX (5000000). VTMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.46 vs. NWAGX (-7.52). VTMNX return over 5 years is better than : 49.82 vs. NWAGX (-24.47).
| NWAGX | VTMNX | NWAGX / VTMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.03 | 3,600% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.03 | 5,067% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.045 | 27.351 | -11% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.8M | 251B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 2.80 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.52 | 18.46 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.00 | 64.35 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.47 | 49.82 | -49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.21 | 69.77 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement