Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWAGX vs VFWPX
NWAGX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts NWAGX vs VFWPX
Nationwide Janus Henderson Overseas A
Price$23.17
Change+$0.36 (+1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.82M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$146.57
Change+$1.25 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.34B
NWAGX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWAGX vs. VFWPX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWAGX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 71.3B vs. NWAGX (23.8M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than NWAGX: VFWPX (2.68) vs NWAGX (1.00). NWAGX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: NWAGX (11 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). NWAGX (1.52) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). NWAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). NWAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: NWAGX (2000) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.96 vs. NWAGX (13.86). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 40.89 vs. NWAGX (-0.12).
| NWAGX | VFWPX | NWAGX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.03 | 3,600% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.03 | 5,067% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.006 | 21.701 | 88% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.8M | 71.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 2.68 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.86 | 15.96 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.05 | 47.91 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.12 | 40.89 | -0% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.34 | 69.76 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement