Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWAGX vs VFWPX
NWAGX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts NWAGX vs VFWPX
Nationwide Janus Henderson Overseas A
Price$22.47
Change+$0.05 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.67M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$140.90
Change+$0.22 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.25B
NWAGX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWAGX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWAGX is a Buy and VFWPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 65.3B vs. NWAGX (23.7M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than NWAGX: VFWPX (2.76) vs NWAGX (1.02). NWAGX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: NWAGX (10 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). NWAGX (1.52) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). NWAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). NWAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: NWAGX (2000) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.33 vs. NWAGX (10.04). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 44.42 vs. NWAGX (4.07).
| NWAGX | VFWPX | NWAGX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.03 | 3,600% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.03 | 5,067% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.365 | 17.999 | 91% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.7M | 65.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 2.76 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.04 | 14.33 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.78 | 39.17 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.07 | 44.42 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.59 | 51.33 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement