Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWADX vs VIGRX
NWADX vs VIGRX Comparison
Open Charts NWADX vs VIGRX
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr Eagle
Price$21.68
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets222.47M
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$238.18
Change-$0.71 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.49B
NWADX vs VIGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWADX vs. VIGRX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWADX is a Buy and VIGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. NWADX (222M). VIGRX pays higher dividends than NWADX: VIGRX (0.32) vs NWADX (0.00). NWADX was incepted earlier than VIGRX: NWADX (7 years) vs VIGRX (33 years). NWADX (1.01) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). VIGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 11.00 vs. NWADX (8.16). VIGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWADX: VIGRX (3000) vs NWADX (50000). VIGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.21 vs. NWADX (20.38). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 100.96 vs. NWADX (37.56).
| NWADX | VIGRX | NWADX / VIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.17 | 541% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.17 | 594% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.152 | 12.727 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 3000 | 1,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 222M | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.32 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.38 | 27.21 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.51 | 96.74 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.56 | 100.96 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 347.40 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement