Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWADX vs RGACX
NWADX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NWADX vs RGACX
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr Eagle
Price$21.69
Change+$0.06 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets218.22M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
NWADX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWADX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWADX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. NWADX (218M). RGACX pays higher dividends than NWADX: RGACX (0.07) vs NWADX (0.00). NWADX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NWADX (7 years) vs RGACX (23 years). NWADX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWADX (8.16). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWADX: RGACX (250) vs NWADX (50000). NWADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.65 vs. RGACX (14.08). NWADX (42.14) and RGACX (41.95) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NWADX | RGACX | NWADX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.94 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.94 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.205 | 14.044 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 250 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.65 | 14.08 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.69 | 41.19 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.14 | 41.95 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 83.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement