Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWADX vs RGACX
NWADX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NWADX vs RGACX
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr Eagle
Price$21.68
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets222.47M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
NWADX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWADX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWADX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. NWADX (222M). RGACX pays higher dividends than NWADX: RGACX (0.07) vs NWADX (0.00). NWADX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NWADX (7 years) vs RGACX (23 years). NWADX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWADX (8.16). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWADX: RGACX (250) vs NWADX (50000). NWADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.38 vs. RGACX (17.83). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. NWADX (37.56).
| NWADX | RGACX | NWADX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.94 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.94 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.152 | 15.516 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 250 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 222M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.38 | 17.83 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.51 | 58.53 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.56 | 40.02 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement