Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWABX vs VTSAX
NWABX vs VTSAX Comparison
Open Charts NWABX vs VTSAX
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Adm
Price$165.45
Change+$4.47 (+2.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06T
NWABX vs VTSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWABX vs. VTSAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWABX is a Buy and VTSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSAX has more cash in the bank: 2.06T vs. NWABX (1.8B). VTSAX pays higher dividends than NWABX: VTSAX (1.09) vs NWABX (0.50). NWABX was incepted earlier than VTSAX: NWABX (8 years) vs VTSAX (25 years). NWABX (0.59) is less costly to investors than VTSAX (0.04). NWABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.38 vs. VTSAX (2.00). VTSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWABX: VTSAX (3000) vs NWABX (1000000). VTSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.80 vs. NWABX (-10.66). VTSAX return over 5 years is better than : 68.23 vs. NWABX (1.58).
| NWABX | VTSAX | NWABX / VTSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.04 | 1,375% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.04 | 1,475% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.649 | 1.379 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.8B | 2.06T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.09 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.66 | 14.80 | -72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.91 | 64.03 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.58 | 68.23 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 270.92 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement