Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWABX vs VITSX
NWABX vs VITSX Comparison
Open Charts NWABX vs VITSX
Vanguard Total Stock Market Idx I
Price$165.48
Change+$4.48 (+2.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06T
NWABX vs VITSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWABX vs. VITSX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWABX is a Buy and VITSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VITSX has more cash in the bank: 2.06T vs. NWABX (1.8B). VITSX pays higher dividends than NWABX: VITSX (1.10) vs NWABX (0.50). NWABX was incepted earlier than VITSX: NWABX (8 years) vs VITSX (29 years). NWABX (0.59) is less costly to investors than VITSX (0.03). NWABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.38 vs. VITSX (2.00). NWABX has a lower initial minimum investment than VITSX: NWABX (1000000) vs VITSX (5000000). VITSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.80 vs. NWABX (-10.66). VITSX return over 5 years is better than : 68.23 vs. NWABX (1.58).
| NWABX | VITSX | NWABX / VITSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.03 | 1,833% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.03 | 1,967% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.649 | 1.378 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 5000000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.8B | 2.06T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.10 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.66 | 14.80 | -72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.91 | 64.03 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.58 | 68.23 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 271.03 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement