Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWABX vs VITSX
NWABX vs VITSX Comparison
Open Charts NWABX vs VITSX
Vanguard Total Stock Market Idx I
Price$155.98
Change+$0.40 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95T
NWABX vs VITSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWABX vs. VITSX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWABX is a Buy and VITSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VITSX has more cash in the bank: 1.95T vs. NWABX (1.79B). VITSX pays higher dividends than NWABX: VITSX (1.17) vs NWABX (0.47). NWABX was incepted earlier than VITSX: NWABX (7 years) vs VITSX (28 years). NWABX (0.59) is less costly to investors than VITSX (0.03). NWABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.61 vs. VITSX (2.00). NWABX has a lower initial minimum investment than VITSX: NWABX (1000000) vs VITSX (5000000). VITSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.04 vs. NWABX (6.18). VITSX return over 5 years is better than : 84.98 vs. NWABX (36.90).
| NWABX | VITSX | NWABX / VITSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.03 | 1,833% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.03 | 1,967% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.915 | 10.352 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 5000000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.79B | 1.95T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.17 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.18 | 18.04 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.33 | 63.66 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.90 | 84.98 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 224.85 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement