Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWABX vs VFFSX
NWABX vs VFFSX Comparison
Open Charts NWABX vs VFFSX
Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select
Price$307.28
Change+$2.59 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.43T
NWABX vs VFFSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWABX vs. VFFSX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWABX is a Buy and VFFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFFSX has more cash in the bank: 1.43T vs. NWABX (1.77B). VFFSX pays higher dividends than NWABX: VFFSX (1.23) vs NWABX (0.49). NWABX was incepted earlier than VFFSX: NWABX (7 years) vs VFFSX (9 years). NWABX (0.59) is less costly to investors than VFFSX (0.01). NWABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.61 vs. VFFSX (2.00). NWABX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFFSX: NWABX (1000000) vs VFFSX (5000000000). VFFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.52 vs. NWABX (1.88). VFFSX return over 5 years is better than : 100.98 vs. NWABX (46.56).
| NWABX | VFFSX | NWABX / VFFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.01 | 5,500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.01 | 5,900% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.854 | 6.811 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 5000000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.77B | 1.43T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.23 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.88 | 13.52 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.05 | 64.43 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.56 | 100.98 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement