Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWABX vs VFFSX
NWABX vs VFFSX Comparison
Open Charts NWABX vs VFFSX
Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select
Price$312.76
Change+$1.26 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.49T
NWABX vs VFFSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWABX vs. VFFSX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWABX is a Buy and VFFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFFSX has more cash in the bank: 1.49T vs. NWABX (1.79B). VFFSX pays higher dividends than NWABX: VFFSX (1.23) vs NWABX (0.49). NWABX was incepted earlier than VFFSX: NWABX (7 years) vs VFFSX (9 years). NWABX (0.59) is less costly to investors than VFFSX (0.01). NWABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.61 vs. VFFSX (2.00). NWABX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFFSX: NWABX (1000000) vs VFFSX (5000000000). VFFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.42 vs. NWABX (6.64). VFFSX return over 5 years is better than : 98.97 vs. NWABX (43.39).
| NWABX | VFFSX | NWABX / VFFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.01 | 5,500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.01 | 5,900% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.352 | 8.716 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 5000000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.79B | 1.49T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.23 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.64 | 18.42 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.49 | 63.16 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.39 | 98.97 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |