Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWABX vs RWMFX
NWABX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NWABX vs RWMFX
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$64.56
Change+$0.53 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets202.05B
NWABX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWABX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWABX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 202B vs. NWABX (1.77B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NWABX: RWMFX (1.48) vs NWABX (0.49). NWABX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NWABX (7 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). NWABX (0.59) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). NWABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.61 vs. RWMFX (31.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWABX: RWMFX (250) vs NWABX (1000000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.88 vs. NWABX (1.88). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 56.79 vs. NWABX (46.56).
| NWABX | RWMFX | NWABX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.31 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.31 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.854 | 5.739 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.77B | 202B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.48 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.88 | 7.88 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.05 | 32.20 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.56 | 56.79 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.15 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement