Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWABX vs RWMFX
NWABX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NWABX vs RWMFX
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$65.33
Change+$0.27 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.03B
NWABX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWABX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWABX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. NWABX (1.79B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NWABX: RWMFX (1.48) vs NWABX (0.49). NWABX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NWABX (7 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). NWABX (0.59) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). NWABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.61 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWABX: RWMFX (250) vs NWABX (1000000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.60 vs. NWABX (6.64). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 54.74 vs. NWABX (43.39).
| NWABX | RWMFX | NWABX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.31 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.31 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.352 | 7.001 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.79B | 204B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.48 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.64 | 9.60 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.49 | 32.33 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.39 | 54.74 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 72.42 | - |