Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWABX vs RWEBX
NWABX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts NWABX vs RWEBX
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$64.88
Change+$0.26 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.03B
NWABX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWABX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWABX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. NWABX (1.79B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than NWABX: RWEBX (0.80) vs NWABX (0.49). NWABX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: NWABX (7 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than NWABX (0.59). NWABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.61 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWABX: RWEBX (250) vs NWABX (1000000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.72 vs. NWABX (6.64). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 50.49 vs. NWABX (43.39).
| NWABX | RWEBX | NWABX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 1.06 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.06 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.352 | 6.518 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.79B | 204B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.80 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.64 | 8.72 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.49 | 29.74 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.39 | 50.49 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 66.74 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement