NUFMF
Price
$1.60
Change
+$0.05 (+3.23%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.37B
SNFRF
Price
$0.17
Change
+$0.02 (+13.33%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
945.93M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NUFMF vs SNFRF

Header iconNUFMF vs SNFRF Comparison
Open Charts NUFMF vs SNFRFBanner chart's image
NuFarm
Price$1.60
Change+$0.05 (+3.23%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.37B
Sinofert Holdings
Price$0.17
Change+$0.02 (+13.33%)
Volume$5.74K
Capitalization945.93M
NUFMF vs SNFRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NUFMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNFRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NUFMF vs. SNFRF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NUFMF is a Hold and SNFRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (NUFMF: $1.60 vs. SNFRF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: NUFMF and SNFRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Agricultural industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NUFMF: 5% vs. SNFRF: 88%
Market capitalization -- NUFMF: $1.37B vs. SNFRF: $945.93M
NUFMF [@Chemicals: Agricultural] is valued at $1.37B. SNFRF’s [@Chemicals: Agricultural] market capitalization is $945.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry ranges from $40.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry is $4.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NUFMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSNFRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NUFMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SNFRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SNFRF is a better buy in the long-term than NUFMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NUFMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNFRF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NUFMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SNFRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NUFMF is a better buy in the short-term than SNFRF.

Price Growth

NUFMF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SNFRF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was +17.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +3.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.60%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Agricultural (+3.23% weekly)

The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NUFMF($1.37B) has a higher market cap than SNFRF($946M). NUFMF has higher P/E ratio than SNFRF: NUFMF (18.42) vs SNFRF (6.71). SNFRF YTD gains are higher at: 24.733 vs. NUFMF (-30.357). SNFRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.27B vs. NUFMF (425M). SNFRF has more cash in the bank: 2.88B vs. NUFMF (687M). NUFMF has less debt than SNFRF: NUFMF (1.13B) vs SNFRF (1.62B). SNFRF has higher revenues than NUFMF: SNFRF (24.4B) vs NUFMF (3.73B).
NUFMFSNFRFNUFMF / SNFRF
Capitalization1.37B946M145%
EBITDA425M1.27B34%
Gain YTD-30.35724.733-123%
P/E Ratio18.426.71275%
Revenue3.73B24.4B15%
Total Cash687M2.88B24%
Total Debt1.13B1.62B70%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NUFMF vs SNFRF: Fundamental Ratings
NUFMF
SNFRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10034
SMR RATING
1..100
9458
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6541
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
279
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SNFRF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NUFMF (53). This means that SNFRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NUFMF’s over the last 12 months.

SNFRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NUFMF (100). This means that SNFRF’s stock grew significantly faster than NUFMF’s over the last 12 months.

SNFRF's SMR Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NUFMF (94). This means that SNFRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NUFMF’s over the last 12 months.

SNFRF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as NUFMF (65). This means that SNFRF’s stock grew similarly to NUFMF’s over the last 12 months.

NUFMF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SNFRF (79). This means that NUFMF’s stock grew significantly faster than SNFRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NUFMFSNFRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
29%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
26%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
26%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
38%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
28%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NUFMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNFRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FZANX48.350.51
+1.07%
Fidelity Advisor New Insights Z
MOJOX15.930.13
+0.82%
Donoghue Forlines Momentum I
BRSYX14.780.11
+0.75%
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq R6
VMCCX53.230.32
+0.60%
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core C
BIASX22.720.11
+0.49%
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Inv

NUFMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NUFMF and VRDR have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NUFMF and VRDR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NUFMF
1D Price
Change %
NUFMF100%
N/A
VRDR - NUFMF
9%
Poorly correlated
+7.14%
VVIVF - NUFMF
4%
Poorly correlated
+4.80%
YARIY - NUFMF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.26%
PUBC - NUFMF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
SBMSF - NUFMF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SNFRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SNFRF and VVIVF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNFRF and VVIVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNFRF
1D Price
Change %
SNFRF100%
N/A
VVIVF - SNFRF
6%
Poorly correlated
+4.80%
VRDR - SNFRF
5%
Poorly correlated
+7.14%
MGROF - SNFRF
1%
Poorly correlated
-8.98%
NUFMF - SNFRF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBLUF - SNFRF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More