NUFMF
Price
$1.50
Change
-$0.10 (-6.25%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
570.8M
SBMSF
Price
$0.06
Change
+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
10.83M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NUFMF vs SBMSF

Header iconNUFMF vs SBMSF Comparison
Open Charts NUFMF vs SBMSFBanner chart's image
NuFarm
Price$1.50
Change-$0.10 (-6.25%)
Volume$500
Capitalization570.8M
Danakali
Price$0.06
Change+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization10.83M
NUFMF vs SBMSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NUFMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NUFMF vs. SBMSF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NUFMF is a Hold and SBMSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (NUFMF: $1.50 vs. SBMSF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: NUFMF and SBMSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Agricultural industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NUFMF: 13% vs. SBMSF: 5%
Market capitalization -- NUFMF: $570.8M vs. SBMSF: $10.83M
NUFMF [@Chemicals: Agricultural] is valued at $570.8M. SBMSF’s [@Chemicals: Agricultural] market capitalization is $10.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry ranges from $46.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry is $4.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NUFMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBMSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NUFMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBMSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NUFMF and SBMSF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NUFMF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBMSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NUFMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SBMSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SBMSF is a better buy in the short-term than NUFMF.

Price Growth

NUFMF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SBMSF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was -13.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Agricultural (+0.38% weekly)

The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NUFMF($571M) has a higher market cap than SBMSF($10.8M). NUFMF has higher P/E ratio than SBMSF: NUFMF (103.60) vs SBMSF (33.74). NUFMF YTD gains are higher at: -35.000 vs. SBMSF (-61.856).
NUFMFSBMSFNUFMF / SBMSF
Capitalization571M10.8M5,287%
EBITDA271MN/A-
Gain YTD-35.000-61.85657%
P/E Ratio103.6033.74307%
Revenue3.4BN/A-
Total Cash464MN/A-
Total Debt1.1BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NUFMF vs SBMSF: Fundamental Ratings
NUFMF
SBMSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9595
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8944
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
397
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5046

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NUFMF's Valuation (47) in the null industry is in the same range as SBMSF (47). This means that NUFMF’s stock grew similarly to SBMSF’s over the last 12 months.

NUFMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SBMSF (100). This means that NUFMF’s stock grew similarly to SBMSF’s over the last 12 months.

NUFMF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as SBMSF (95). This means that NUFMF’s stock grew similarly to SBMSF’s over the last 12 months.

SBMSF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NUFMF (89). This means that SBMSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NUFMF’s over the last 12 months.

NUFMF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SBMSF (97). This means that NUFMF’s stock grew significantly faster than SBMSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NUFMFSBMSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NUFMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EITVX43.430.34
+0.79%
Eaton Vance Tx-Mgd Value I
IRVIX26.290.19
+0.73%
Voya Russell Large Cap Value Idx Port I
MMFFX15.060.08
+0.53%
MM S&P 500® Index A
TSNIX61.740.11
+0.18%
T. Rowe Price Science & Tech I
CFGIX18.520.03
+0.16%
Cromwell Foresight Global Infras Instl

NUFMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NUFMF and VRDR have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NUFMF and VRDR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NUFMF
1D Price
Change %
NUFMF100%
N/A
VRDR - NUFMF
9%
Poorly correlated
+10.15%
VVIVF - NUFMF
4%
Poorly correlated
+7.69%
YARIY - NUFMF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
PUBC - NUFMF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBMSF - NUFMF
0%
Poorly correlated
+20.00%
More

SBMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBMSF and YRAIF have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBMSF and YRAIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBMSF
1D Price
Change %
SBMSF100%
+20.00%
YRAIF - SBMSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PUBC - SBMSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NUFMF - SBMSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YARIY - SBMSF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
MGROF - SBMSF
-5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More