NU
Price
$15.19
Change
-$0.45 (-2.88%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
97 days until earnings call
PLQC
Price
$57.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 7 closing price
Ad is loading...

NU vs PLQC

Header iconNU vs PLQC Comparison
Open Charts NU vs PLQCBanner chart's image
Nu Holdings
Price$15.19
Change-$0.45 (-2.88%)
Volume$100.68M
CapitalizationN/A
Plains Acquisition
Price$57.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
NU vs PLQC Comparison Chart
Loading...
NU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NU vs. PLQC commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NU is a StrongBuy and PLQC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (NU: $15.19 vs. PLQC: $57.50)
Brand notoriety: NU and PLQC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NU: 368% vs. PLQC: 6%
Market capitalization -- NU: $56.33B vs. PLQC: $0
NU [@Regional Banks] is valued at $56.33B. PLQC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePLQC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PLQC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NU is a better buy in the long-term than PLQC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NU’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NU’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

NU (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.20% price change this week, while PLQC (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

NU is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.80% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NU YTD gains are higher at: 87.755 vs. PLQC (30.867).
NUPLQCNU / PLQC
Capitalization56.3BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD87.75530.867284%
P/E Ratio55.73N/A-
Revenue4.91BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.12BN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X90584.1640002628.351600
+2.99%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA330.241.75
+0.53%
Tesla
AAPL225.120.89
+0.40%
Apple
SPY597.190.29
+0.05%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.46-0.38
-1.42%
GameStop Corp

NU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NU has been loosely correlated with INTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NU jumps, then INTR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NU
1D Price
Change %
NU100%
-1.26%
INTR - NU
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
ITUB - NU
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.66%
BAP - NU
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
MNSB - NU
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
RRBI - NU
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.90%
More

PLQC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLQC and CHBAF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLQC and CHBAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLQC
1D Price
Change %
PLQC100%
N/A
CHBAF - PLQC
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CWBK - PLQC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNND - PLQC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKALF - PLQC
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NU - PLQC
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.26%
More