NU
Price
$11.90
Change
-$0.10 (-0.83%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
56.33B
60 days until earnings call
PLQC
Price
$57.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

NU vs PLQC

Header iconNU vs PLQC Comparison
Open Charts NU vs PLQCBanner chart's image
Nu Holdings
Price$11.90
Change-$0.10 (-0.83%)
Volume$54.22M
Capitalization56.33B
Plains Acquisition
Price$57.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$220
CapitalizationN/A
NU vs PLQC Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NU vs. PLQC commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NU is a Hold and PLQC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (NU: $11.90 vs. PLQC: $57.50)
Brand notoriety: NU and PLQC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NU: 105% vs. PLQC: 4%
Market capitalization -- NU: $56.33B vs. PLQC: $0
NU [@Regional Banks] is valued at $56.33B. PLQC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePLQC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PLQC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PLQC is a better buy in the long-term than NU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NU’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

NU (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.06% price change this week, while PLQC (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

NU is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NU YTD gains are higher at: 14.865 vs. PLQC (2.164).
NUPLQCNU / PLQC
Capitalization56.3BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.8652.164687%
P/E Ratio55.73N/A-
Revenue4.91BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.12BN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NOW988.66-18.71
-1.86%
SERVICENOW
HIMX8.88-0.23
-2.52%
Himax Technologies
LUNG3.03-0.11
-3.50%
Pulmonx Corp
NBIS47.13-3.15
-6.26%
Nebius Group N.V.
NSPR2.32-0.18
-7.20%
InspireMD

NU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NU has been loosely correlated with BSBR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NU jumps, then BSBR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NU
1D Price
Change %
NU100%
-0.83%
BSBR - NU
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
SNV - NU
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.92%
INTR - NU
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
FHN - NU
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.85%
AMAL - NU
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.36%
More

PLQC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLQC and CHBAF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLQC and CHBAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLQC
1D Price
Change %
PLQC100%
N/A
CHBAF - PLQC
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CWBK - PLQC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNND - PLQC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKALF - PLQC
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NU - PLQC
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
More