NTWK
Price
$2.87
Change
-$0.05 (-1.71%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
TMICF
Price
$59.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 30 closing price
Ad is loading...

NTWK vs TMICF

Header iconNTWK vs TMICF Comparison
Open Charts NTWK vs TMICFBanner chart's image
NetSol Technologies
Price$2.87
Change-$0.05 (-1.71%)
Volume$16.98K
CapitalizationN/A
Trend Micro
Price$59.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
NTWK vs TMICF Comparison Chart
Loading...
NTWK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NTWK vs. TMICF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NTWK is a Hold and TMICF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (NTWK: $2.92 vs. TMICF: $59.08)
Brand notoriety: NTWK and TMICF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NTWK: 193% vs. TMICF: 74%
Market capitalization -- NTWK: $31.55M vs. TMICF: $6.47B
NTWK [@Packaged Software] is valued at $31.55M. TMICF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $6.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NTWK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTMICF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NTWK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TMICF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TMICF is a better buy in the long-term than NTWK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NTWK’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NTWK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

NTWK (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.34% price change this week, while TMICF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

NTWK is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.15% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMICF($6.47B) has a higher market cap than NTWK($31.6M). TMICF has higher P/E ratio than NTWK: TMICF (34.48) vs NTWK (10.79). TMICF YTD gains are higher at: 49.334 vs. NTWK (32.727). TMICF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 65.3B vs. NTWK (4.23M). TMICF has more cash in the bank: 231B vs. NTWK (15.7M). TMICF has higher revenues than NTWK: TMICF (232B) vs NTWK (56.8M).
NTWKTMICFNTWK / TMICF
Capitalization31.6M6.47B0%
EBITDA4.23M65.3B0%
Gain YTD32.72749.33466%
P/E Ratio10.7934.4831%
Revenue56.8M232B0%
Total Cash15.7M231B0%
Total Debt7.79MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NTWK vs TMICF: Fundamental Ratings
NTWK
TMICF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1046
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10054
SMR RATING
1..100
9161
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4344
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7290
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NTWK's Valuation (57) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as TMICF (81) in the null industry. This means that NTWK’s stock grew similarly to TMICF’s over the last 12 months.

TMICF's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTWK (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that TMICF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTWK’s over the last 12 months.

TMICF's SMR Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as NTWK (91) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that TMICF’s stock grew similarly to NTWK’s over the last 12 months.

NTWK's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as TMICF (44) in the null industry. This means that NTWK’s stock grew similarly to TMICF’s over the last 12 months.

NTWK's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as TMICF (90) in the null industry. This means that NTWK’s stock grew similarly to TMICF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NTWK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NTWK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X90584.1640002628.351600
+2.99%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA330.241.75
+0.53%
Tesla
AAPL225.120.89
+0.40%
Apple
SPY597.190.29
+0.05%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.46-0.38
-1.42%
GameStop Corp

NTWK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NTWK and TMICF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTWK and TMICF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTWK
1D Price
Change %
NTWK100%
-8.18%
TMICF - NTWK
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZI - NTWK
23%
Poorly correlated
-19.50%
NUKK - NTWK
22%
Poorly correlated
-21.71%
PET - NTWK
21%
Poorly correlated
-67.98%
PAYC - NTWK
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
More

TMICF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMICF has been loosely correlated with BMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMICF jumps, then BMR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMICF
1D Price
Change %
TMICF100%
N/A
BMR - TMICF
62%
Loosely correlated
-4.55%
NTWK - TMICF
30%
Poorly correlated
-8.18%
HCAT - TMICF
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.52%
NUKK - TMICF
20%
Poorly correlated
-21.71%
TMICY - TMICF
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
More